Re: [Qirg] Review of draft-irtf-qirg-principles-06

Wojciech Kozlowski <W.Kozlowski@tudelft.nl> Mon, 29 March 2021 19:30 UTC

Return-Path: <W.Kozlowski@tudelft.nl>
X-Original-To: qirg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: qirg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E4153A1F42 for <qirg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 12:30:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.918
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.918 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jkRtBjRR9GCj for <qirg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 12:30:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailservice.tudelft.nl (mailservice.tudelft.nl [130.161.131.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A36B23A1F3F for <qirg@irtf.org>; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 12:30:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by amavis (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47ACC400EB for <qirg@irtf.org>; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 21:30:51 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at tudelft.nl
Received: from mailservice.tudelft.nl ([130.161.131.69]) by localhost (tudelft.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id fjjc7OFLXWh2 for <qirg@irtf.org>; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 21:30:49 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from SRV216.tudelft.net (srv216.tudelft.net [131.180.6.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.tudelft.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCB6C400E3 for <qirg@irtf.org>; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 21:30:49 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from SRV217.tudelft.net (131.180.6.17) by SRV216.tudelft.net (131.180.6.16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2242.4; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 21:30:49 +0200
Received: from SRV217.tudelft.net ([fe80::1f9:fdaf:2ae6:2ebe]) by SRV217.tudelft.net ([fe80::1f9:fdaf:2ae6:2ebe%2]) with mapi id 15.01.2242.004; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 21:30:49 +0200
From: Wojciech Kozlowski <W.Kozlowski@tudelft.nl>
To: "qirg@irtf.org" <qirg@irtf.org>
Thread-Topic: Review of draft-irtf-qirg-principles-06
Thread-Index: AQHXFl6FsBhMsQRW5Ua861Cnv40gmaqbc7/Q
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 19:30:49 +0000
Message-ID: <64a9b368d3df4455af839ae23026cb9b@tudelft.nl>
References: <1D4AA41C-D7DD-4FC7-B083-51E6858297D8@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <1D4AA41C-D7DD-4FC7-B083-51E6858297D8@ericsson.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/qirg/avI7r442afxDLxBOMvKPtEpmk_g>
Subject: Re: [Qirg] Review of draft-irtf-qirg-principles-06
X-BeenThere: qirg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Quantum Internet RG <qirg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/qirg>, <mailto:qirg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/qirg/>
List-Post: <mailto:qirg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qirg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/qirg>, <mailto:qirg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 19:30:58 -0000

Hi John,

Thanks for your feedback! Apologies for the delay - I was waiting to see if more feedback arrives after the last call so that I could address all of them in one go.

Github diff: https://github.com/Wojtek242/draft-irtf-qirg-principles/commit/96067861320826ce8a75bf38bab4cd360b364f3c

Replies in-line below. I left out two of your suggestions. However, if others agree with those two points, let me know, and I'll incorporate them.

Wojtek

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Qirg <qirg-bounces@irtf.org> On Behalf Of John Mattsson
> Sent: 11 March 2021 11:09
> To: qirg@irtf.org
> Subject: [Qirg] Review of draft-irtf-qirg-principles-06
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I think this document is very well-written. It is also a very useful document. I
> have some comments below but otherwise I think this document is ready for
> WGLC and publication.
> 
> Cheers,
> John
> 
> 
> 
> - Abstract:
> "The first realisations of quantum networks are imminent"
> 
> My understanding is that several quantum networks have been built in the
> past.
> One by DARPA in Massachusetts 2001 and one in Vienna 2003 to name a
> few...
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-
> 3A__en.wikipedia.org_wiki_Quantum-
> 5Fnetwork&d=DwICAg&c=XYzUhXBD2cD-CornpT4QE19xOJBbRy-
> TBPLK0X9U2o8&r=xRe3k8UnFVGCjuC7RWUARpslGfYlRaP7D3dVZXHUEVc&m
> =JjIraP3t060tJhFYfYDD_Dq5vZBTobY4U7kxyArRc9s&s=HxacZxiood58Hsl0odcR
> YJreezpnltqpcW--xUUcilQ&e=
> I think the sentence needs to be reformulated.
> 

 [WK] Rephrased to "quantum entanglement networks" 

> 
> - Section 1:
> OLD "such as secure communications"
> NEW "such as quantum cryptography"
> 
> Talking about "communication" is quite limiting. It like saying that
> classic crypto is all about communication. There are a lot of
> exciting quantum cryptography research that may turn out to be
> practically useful in the future.
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-
> 3A__en.wikipedia.org_wiki_Quantum-
> 5Fcryptography&d=DwICAg&c=XYzUhXBD2cD-CornpT4QE19xOJBbRy-
> TBPLK0X9U2o8&r=xRe3k8UnFVGCjuC7RWUARpslGfYlRaP7D3dVZXHUEVc&m
> =JjIraP3t060tJhFYfYDD_Dq5vZBTobY4U7kxyArRc9s&s=_OX5epJ9iPFcDUZQu0
> 3bkjxdIvku6D-hIYnZfM4Jrso&e=
> 
> 
> - Section 2.1:
> 
> "a |0> + b |1>"
> 
> Would maybe be good to mention that a and b are complex
> 

 [WK] It does already say that

> 
> - Section 4.1.2. No-cloning theorem
> 
> I think the document need to explain that it is still possible to produce
> imperfect copies.
> Might also be good to mention some other theorems like the no-
> communication theorem, no-teleportation theorem, no-deletion theorem...
> Especially no-communication theorem, no-teleportation theorem would be
> good to mention with a few sentences each.
> 

[WK] I'm not so sure. I've been trying to avoid going too deep into the details to keep the document high-level. I could include it if others support this modification though.

> 
> - Section 4.4.1
> 
> "since photons cannot be stored"
> 
> Maybe change to "photons are hard to store". A easy way to "store" a
> photon for a short period of time is to send it through a local optical fibre
> loop.
> 

[WK] Done

> 
> - Section 4.4.2
> 
> "10s of kms in optical fibre or 1000 kms in free space"
> 
> Reformulate to use "kilometers" or "km". Using plural in the unit seems very
> non-SI compliant.
> 

[WK] Done

> 
> - Section 5.3.2
> 
> "Quantum routers" vs. "Quantum repeater"
> 
> This section defines "Quantum router" as a special kind of quantum repeater.
> Quantum Repeater is not defined in this section but used much more than
> quantum router in the document. Seems like the term "quantum repeater"
> should be defined.
> 

[WK] Repeaters are defined when discussing entanglement swapping and then used multiple times. I'm not sure a definition here would add much. I can add something if others find this confusing as well.

> _______________________________________________
> Qirg mailing list
> Qirg@irtf.org
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-
> 3A__www.irtf.org_mailman_listinfo_qirg&d=DwICAg&c=XYzUhXBD2cD-
> CornpT4QE19xOJBbRy-
> TBPLK0X9U2o8&r=xRe3k8UnFVGCjuC7RWUARpslGfYlRaP7D3dVZXHUEVc&m
> =JjIraP3t060tJhFYfYDD_Dq5vZBTobY4U7kxyArRc9s&s=R-
> xrqnlUeincohmBxa2aBM8mNXXmwAQ543X893EdBJA&e=