Re: [Qirg] Working on draft on GitHub?

Max Franke <mfranke@inet.tu-berlin.de> Tue, 02 April 2019 12:28 UTC

Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2019 14:28:56 +0200
Message-ID: <0fe45065-372e-495a-9609-e8b00f2affea@email.android.com>
In-Reply-To: <30372ec5-aae4-fcf2-ac2f-74b9097369c2@tudelft.nl>
From: Max Franke <mfranke@inet.tu-berlin.de>
To: Wojciech Kozlowski <w.kozlowski@tudelft.nl>
Cc: Rodney Van Meter <rdv@sfc.wide.ad.jp>, qirg@irtf.org
Importance: Normal
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/qirg/re50RDFIFPdCML529QID4gI5zsA>
Subject: Re: [Qirg] Working on draft on GitHub?
Precedence: list

TAPS had similar issues, as in a lot of the discussion has moved from the mailing list to issues on github. It was solved by using a script that creates digests from the Github activity. You can find the one set up by Brian Trammel for TAPS here: https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/github-notify-ml

Max

Am 02.04.2019 10:07 schrieb Wojciech Kozlowski <w.kozlowski@tudelft.nl>:

I wasn't aware of the tutorial. I just found the recording
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xyw_mUM1p-g&list=PLC86T-6ZTP5h1oFBcEjNAee2z6hAyv_hN&index=5&t=0s)
and it's all about I-Ds and not just git so I'll watch it before uploading.

Good point about contributions on the list. I'll see if the tutorial
says anything about it, but otherwise relevant parts of the discussion
can be brought to the mailing list and obviously every now and then a
version will be posted to the mailing list for comments.

Wojtek

On 02/04/2019 09:53, Rodney Van Meter wrote:
> There was a tutorial on using github on Sunday. I’ll admit I skipped out on that, planning to watch the video, which I have not yet done.
>
> But I’m happy to see stuff develop via github. That’s my personal opinion, I don’t think there’s a need to make it QIRG policy, but hard to imagine anyone objecting.
>
> Note that this draft *is* an RG work item now, so it’s important that everyone can contribute, but they can continue to do so via the list, even if they don’t github.
>
> —Rod
>
>> On Apr 2, 2019, at 4:46 PM, Wojciech Kozlowski <w.kozlowski@tudelft.nl> wrote:
>>
>> Hi QIRG,
>>
>> I'm currently absorbing the first round of feedback for draft-irtf-qirg-principles-00. People also asked some non-editorial questions and made suggestions on what should be included. As mentioned in my presentation I would like to open the floor to the QIRG and make it easy for us to discuss these questions.
>>
>> I noticed some other WGs at the IETF use GitHub for working on drafts and I was thinking of doing the same. That way we can use its issue and pull request system for collaborating. But before I do that I wanted to check if anybody has any objections to that?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Wojtek
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Qirg mailing list
>> Qirg@irtf.org
>> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/qirg

_______________________________________________
Qirg mailing list
Qirg@irtf.org
https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/qirg

[Qirg] Working on draft on GitHub? Wojciech Kozlowski
Re: [Qirg] Working on draft on GitHub? Rodney Van Meter
Re: [Qirg] Working on draft on GitHub? Wojciech Kozlowski
Re: [Qirg] Working on draft on GitHub? Bruno Rijsman
Re: [Qirg] Working on draft on GitHub? Max Franke
Re: [Qirg] Working on draft on GitHub? John Wroclawski