Re: [Qirg] Feedback request: new QIRG charter

Wojciech Kozlowski <> Fri, 01 May 2020 13:13 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E4CD3A11DC for <>; Fri, 1 May 2020 06:13:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.796
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.796 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WKa44uEybqMx for <>; Fri, 1 May 2020 06:13:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AFD5A3A11D9 for <>; Fri, 1 May 2020 06:13:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by amavis (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC9E96400AA; Fri, 1 May 2020 15:13:04 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id pVqh9GeXcV4K; Fri, 1 May 2020 15:13:03 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7DFCC640081; Fri, 1 May 2020 15:13:03 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P521) id 15.1.1913.5; Fri, 1 May 2020 15:12:56 +0200
Received: from ([fe80::dc7a:a6b8:8bb9:2210]) by ([fe80::dc7a:a6b8:8bb9:2210%13]) with mapi id 15.01.1913.007; Fri, 1 May 2020 15:12:57 +0200
From: Wojciech Kozlowski <>
To: "" <>
CC: "" <>
Thread-Topic: [Qirg] Feedback request: new QIRG charter
Thread-Index: AQHWHVlOdCGlmMXpHkOj1+TXqZQE7KiOrJ2AgARrngA=
Date: Fri, 1 May 2020 13:12:56 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-GB, nl-NL, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_7dd8db61a809c013922483e72b74a18e17b8b1d5cameltudelftnl_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Qirg] Feedback request: new QIRG charter
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Quantum Internet \(proposed\) RG" <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 May 2020 13:13:10 -0000

Hmm. Good point.

I guess we either write The Quantum Internet (capitalised) or A quantum internet (not capitalised). I usually write the latter, because it doesn't exist yet, but if we're capitalising it then we definitely should use former. Anybody else has an opinion on which one to use? Otherwise, I'd go with the former "The Quantum Internet".


On Tue, 2020-04-28 at 19:42 +0200, Marcello Caleffi wrote:
Hi Wojtek,
a stylistic comment from the first couple of lines: should we prefer "the Quantum Internet” over “a Quantum Internet”, given that the “Internet” word is capitalized?<>

I usually write “the Quantum Internet” in my articles, given that my vision is about a unique global interconnected quantum network (the Quantum Internet) that augments/exploits the current unique ip-based global interconnected network (the Internet).
But I wonder whether my stylistic choice make sense.

What do you think?


Il giorno 28 apr 2020, alle ore 14:34, Wojciech Kozlowski <<>> ha scritto:

Dear QIRG,

As a full RG in the IRTF now we would like to refresh the group's charter. Rod
and I have created an updated version (attached, together with diff).  For
reference, the current charter is here:<>iSC3efgv1neMJrNSLpg&e=>.

If anybody has any comments about the update, could you please share them on
this mailing list before the end of this week.

Qirg mailing list<><>