Re: PQC and QOSPF

Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> Mon, 27 July 1998 09:10 UTC

Delivery-Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1998 05:11:02 -0400
Return-Path: owner-qosr@ca.newbridge.com
Received: from ns.newbridge.com (ns.newbridge.com [192.75.23.67]) by ietf.org (8.8.5/8.8.7a) with ESMTP id FAA13497 for <ietf-archive@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Jul 1998 05:10:57 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from smtpd@localhost) by ns.newbridge.com (8.8.8/8.6.12) id FAA08144; Mon, 27 Jul 1998 05:07:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from kanata-gw1.newbridge.com(192.75.23.72), claiming to be "kanata-gw1.ca.newbridge.com" via SMTP by ns.newbridge.com, id smtpdAAAa08123; Mon Jul 27 05:07:09 1998
Received: from kanmaster.ca.newbridge.com by kanata-gw1.ca.newbridge.com via smtpd (for ns.newbridge.com [192.75.23.67]) with SMTP; 27 Jul 1998 09:07:07 UT
Received: from distmaster.newbridge.com (distmaster.ca.newbridge.com [138.120.118.27]) by ca.newbridge.com. (8.8.8/8.8.6) with SMTP id FAA10719; Mon, 27 Jul 1998 05:07:06 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by distmaster.newbridge.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id EAA26647; Mon, 27 Jul 1998 04:45:07 -0400
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Message-Id: <199807270829.RAA03660@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Subject: Re: PQC and QOSPF
To: K.Carlberg@cs.ucl.ac.uk
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1998 17:29:12 -0000
Cc: ychen@fla.fujitsu.com, qosr@newbridge.com
In-Reply-To: <856.901363198@cs.ucl.ac.uk>; from "Kenneth CARLBERG" at Jul 25, 98 11:39 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11]
Sender: owner-qosr@ca.newbridge.com
Precedence: bulk
X-Info: [Un]Subscribe to qosr-request@newbridge.com

Ken;

> > Although still not quite sure about the traffic measurement 
> > part (have yet to investigate what such a technique can do), 
> > I pretty much agree that we should "evolve routing, signaling, 
> > and admission control (and charging) all separately."
> 
> one aspect to keep in mind in the separation model is that time and
> resources are needed to coordinate the separate activities.  if routing
> schema (A) is dependent on signaling schema (B), then (probably) care
> might have to be taken for potential race conditions.

The very basic problem of QoS routing of stepping on one's own
shadow is the dependency loop between the routing schema and
signaling schema.

To break the loop, counter-dependency is the MUST.

An example of poor schema is an ER schema which places the routing
schema in receivers.

							Masataka Ohta