Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Servers can still CANCEL, too. (#2426)

Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com> Wed, 06 February 2019 00:55 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76DE2128CF2 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Feb 2019 16:55:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -12.553
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.553 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-4.553, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BoON49xvQPyb for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Feb 2019 16:55:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-6.smtp.github.com (out-6.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.197]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69A61128B01 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Feb 2019 16:55:02 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2019 16:55:01 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1549414501; bh=NyWQLiC/HSDvUufbJNluMDtp3AeN0o8lYNdguAajvJo=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=Rl5ZNXAtH4AZe8WYuvvU3s28VGpScl1E8ffk71w7c4D3gLBiLDN4IU77nR3oYt7SW VBZsRQqHHiEA1JhH7qXhKgIzP206Pq6Q+ipidpkX1s5EVv6yDD4Lj9M0TTXyT4DTxU 4yGHgCc7CRL3CV9GGIV3u7wlJf14OIAiGzOEt7bM=
From: Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab0baccc53d83333be62c689006d2c219e598a7d9e92cf000000011871f26592a169ce1842dfc4@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2426/review/200375441@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2426@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2426@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Servers can still CANCEL, too. (#2426)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c5a3065ae117_6eb13fc5cf0d45c41136dd"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/-3JvqTmJmzw_jHPMN12Oyov04oo>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2019 00:55:04 -0000

martinthomson commented on this pull request.



> @@ -1382,7 +1386,7 @@ HTTP_PUSH_ALREADY_IN_CACHE (0x04):
 : The server has attempted to push content which the client has cached.
 
 HTTP_REQUEST_CANCELLED (0x05):
-: The client no longer needs the requested data.
+: The sender is no longer processing the request or response.

Not sure if you want to use "processing" here.  It might be read as implying something more (REQUEST_REJECTED).  Maybe:

```suggestion
: The request or its response is cancelled.
```

> @@ -1004,11 +1004,15 @@ some higher layer of software that might have taken some action as a result. The
 client can treat requests rejected by the server as though they had never been
 sent at all, thereby allowing them to be retried later on a new connection.
 Servers MUST NOT use the HTTP_REQUEST_REJECTED error code for requests which
-were partially or fully processed.  When a client sends a STOP_SENDING with
-HTTP_REQUEST_CANCELLED, a server MAY indicate the error code
-HTTP_REQUEST_REJECTED in the corresponding RESET_STREAM if no processing was
-performed.  Clients MUST NOT reset streams with the HTTP_REQUEST_REJECTED error
-code except in response to a QUIC STOP_SENDING frame.
+were partially or fully processed.  When a server abandons a response after
+partial processing, it SHOULD abort its response stream with the error code
+HTTP_REQUEST_CANCELLED.
+
+When a client sends a STOP_SENDING with HTTP_REQUEST_CANCELLED, a server MAY
+indicate the error code HTTP_REQUEST_REJECTED in the corresponding RESET_STREAM

```suggestion
send the error code HTTP_REQUEST_REJECTED in the corresponding RESET_STREAM
```

> @@ -1004,11 +1004,15 @@ some higher layer of software that might have taken some action as a result. The
 client can treat requests rejected by the server as though they had never been
 sent at all, thereby allowing them to be retried later on a new connection.
 Servers MUST NOT use the HTTP_REQUEST_REJECTED error code for requests which
-were partially or fully processed.  When a client sends a STOP_SENDING with
-HTTP_REQUEST_CANCELLED, a server MAY indicate the error code
-HTTP_REQUEST_REJECTED in the corresponding RESET_STREAM if no processing was
-performed.  Clients MUST NOT reset streams with the HTTP_REQUEST_REJECTED error
-code except in response to a QUIC STOP_SENDING frame.
+were partially or fully processed.  When a server abandons a response after
+partial processing, it SHOULD abort its response stream with the error code
+HTTP_REQUEST_CANCELLED.
+
+When a client sends a STOP_SENDING with HTTP_REQUEST_CANCELLED, a server MAY
+indicate the error code HTTP_REQUEST_REJECTED in the corresponding RESET_STREAM
+if no processing was performed.  Clients MUST NOT reset streams with the
+HTTP_REQUEST_REJECTED error code except in response to a QUIC STOP_SENDING
+frame.

```suggestion
frame that contains the same code.
```

The implication here is that a server won't use STOP_SENDING with REQUEST_REJECTED unless they have not processed anything.  That's not necessary obvious to me now, having had some time away from this subject.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2426#pullrequestreview-200375441