Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] On-path calculation of loss and congestion (#632)
Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com> Wed, 30 January 2019 07:38 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D350130F0B for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Jan 2019 23:38:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -11.149
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.149 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-4.553, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Vf3viF5p2_ft for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Jan 2019 23:38:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-3.smtp.github.com (out-3.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C12C3130F01 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Jan 2019 23:38:57 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 23:38:56 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1548833936; bh=0Wlk1KA6VP39J6XbMrc/Vl6HT1bCV90STGk/EMQ7KhI=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=BuqSBXYGAE4hMuOWzJQMiySJocCk1oFkNKTraQfoDVdURMLZlohFtJRBIuwhjQmH7 2luCPTbnG6+x06S6mxnZBRYM21SkFoY3rexLyLpWp1EonmEkPq1IddJyCePJY86nCP gSK32YLAly17jW6eq8pW4n/0ss7FYw/N41g5+BOM=
From: Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab6cfb71ac760ac13670960e6681d97dcf0c7ff8ad92cf000000011869169092a169ce0e0f95f5@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/632/458842600@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/632@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/632@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] On-path calculation of loss and congestion (#632)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c515490dd628_4f3f3f85a2cd45bc2417f8"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/-JKPGBPTZe12FUWD9Zn2xvnuqP8>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 07:38:59 -0000
Tokyo conclusion: this requires something more concrete and anything about this is not going to happen for QUIC version 1. Closing this. In the future, if there are more concrete proposals for what can be measured (and ideally how), then we will need a thorough analysis along the lines of that performed for the spin bit. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/632#issuecomment-458842600
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Explicit support for on-path… Brian Trammell
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Explicit support for on-… janaiyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Explicit support for on-… Brian Trammell
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Explicit support for on-… Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Explicit support for on-… Brian Trammell
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Explicit support for on-… Lars Eggert
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Explicit support for on-… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Explicit support for on-… Brian Trammell
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] On-path calculation of l… Brian Trammell
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] On-path calculation of l… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] On-path calculation of l… Martin Thomson