Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet Number Echo in Public Header (#269)
Brian Trammell <notifications@github.com> Thu, 02 March 2017 17:54 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17D2E129594 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Mar 2017 09:54:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.383
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.383 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5PrFhiC9NOfJ for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Mar 2017 09:54:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2-ext1.iad.github.net [192.30.252.192]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79521129593 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Mar 2017 09:54:52 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2017 09:54:51 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1488477291; bh=dm8gssT0CCX14rNZrei4JXwnvaE1aOMckzy8uKckJr8=; h=From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=lL4GPGBPrrvR6+yEL1IHuf01jWtdpbgSZrZHFUhd40VM6yDyewygis0QQomtyXBPD EHYHz1i7VjSsS0z0ORPwte3hq/USvxGNLcifFTfak2nk5324IqRB9Vbt/F7jgLq3Vj 8rfGqGADdTVM84LZ5lnKcgffosxoiE67QxiyiMU0=
From: Brian Trammell <notifications@github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/269/283728349@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/269@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/269@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet Number Echo in Public Header (#269)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_58b85c6bae0d4_2bba3ff0d2149c381095df"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: britram
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/-fHkOs_vjZbcNphKuvicN9jy4Sc>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Reply-To: quic@ietf.org
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2017 17:54:54 -0000
@mirjak I'm not sure that e.g. a 4-byte PN with a 2-byte echo makes sense: if you actually need four bytes of packet number on a high-delay link, guessing the wrong values for octets 2 and 3 might inject a lot of error. Need to think about this a bit more... -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/269#issuecomment-283728349
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet Number Echo in Public… martinduke
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet Number Echo in Pu… Brian Trammell
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet Number Echo in Pu… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet Number Echo in Pu… Brian Trammell
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet Number Echo in Pu… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet Number Echo in Pu… martinduke
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet Number Echo in Pu… Brian Trammell
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet Number Echo in Pu… Brian Trammell
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet Number Echo in Pu… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet Number Echo in Pu… acmacm
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet Number Echo in Pu… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet Number Echo in Pu… mirjak
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet Number Echo in Pu… Brian Trammell
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet Number Echo in Pu… Brian Trammell
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet Number Echo in Pu… Brian Trammell
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet Number Echo in Pu… Brian Trammell
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet Number Echo in Pu… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet Number Echo in Pu… Al Morton
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet Number Echo in Pu… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet Number Echo in Pu… Brian Trammell
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Public Packet Number Ech… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Public Packet Number Ech… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Public Packet Number Ech… ianswett