Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Transport parameter registry is too constraining for innovation (#3020)

Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com> Thu, 12 September 2019 01:05 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30DF3120AE0 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 18:05:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.454
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uMrw_Xud8U6E for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 18:05:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-17.smtp.github.com (out-17.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BEE7B120A93 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 18:05:11 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 18:05:10 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1568250310; bh=l2hHDSpR+RpvHDyiPDYEIzVQvaCMGZ417N69yRw/sAA=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=qKHdu/hdbFZPVzd1YCp+OHVoR+WroJ1dYPL7khmnfz/xPGrkz5pr6vjd/iDNepl6Y 8HyBLyxZ0SjGcZ7kFBXfvw79um0YRWw0UTlpt9/z/ekhmXbgg5OfCb5hWX1rlbsOJK uOAE73wDcDgeSQ/5W0Xlo7wyI/INolzFNt4cIZjc=
From: Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK7XZZD7OUAOU2FCOGF3Q27DNEVBNHHB2WTA7U@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3020/530622380@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3020@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3020@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Transport parameter registry is too constraining for innovation (#3020)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5d7999c695a7c_53a63f80648cd95c9829a"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/-zbNvFQFNJjRD_heyv4Z8XUn-NQ>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 01:05:16 -0000

You aren't the first to suggest this one.  Let's make sure we at least discuss this directly.  We did discuss this in the context of the issues that you cite and decided not to, but that was never the central question.

>From our perspective, this isn't a significant change to code.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3020#issuecomment-530622380