Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Retaining the largest received packet number (#3541)
Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com> Wed, 01 April 2020 23:26 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C1523A135F for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 16:26:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.008
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.008 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16=1.092, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HAwpoabsTVTU for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 16:26:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-7.smtp.github.com (out-7.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 407D83A135D for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 16:26:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-943b171.ac4-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-943b171.ac4-iad.github.net [10.52.22.59]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED8122C1380 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 16:26:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1585783597; bh=ymE4lDRbZsbnkKoJCsFhWPSN19VWE1MNDSp0n+cto7I=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=yF3q5SkXoYtFflP/bDAvA2xYVptJA+RcTb1uKUh3xg4HwMRYs/qapvwI8q6XSMLDj yxaJCwUh5SPmlkc/gJtMsh5ZxI83g1CJWguejWIuMp9upcZ+m6ut5WXBbnp+kKbWiq sRxUe5a1I8PFboT6Mu1kgjFXuCbjKLrzhwVJ5xUw=
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2020 16:26:37 -0700
From: Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK6CPIUOZG6N3GONLCF4SECC3EVBNHHCF233TE@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3541/607538378@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3541@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3541@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Retaining the largest received packet number (#3541)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e85232ddbd9c_27143fe306ccd96c63419"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/-zwkJ5oTjc7FG1QyIHvkqLmWgRA>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2020 23:26:41 -0000
That matches my model for this. It is also likely the case that the next packet you receive is largest+1, so there is no real advantage to forgetting the largest acknowledged. Not sending it is slightly different though. I can understand how an implementation might choose to send only ranges that have recently changed. My contention is that this is not a good choice and we should recommend against that. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3541#issuecomment-607538378
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Retaining the largest receiv… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Retaining the largest re… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Retaining the largest re… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Retaining the largest re… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Retaining the largest re… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Retaining the largest re… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Retaining the largest re… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Retaining the largest re… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Retaining the largest re… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Retaining the largest re… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Retaining the largest re… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Retaining the largest re… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Retaining the largest re… Martin Thomson