Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Define "under-utilization" of cwnd (#2630)
ianswett <notifications@github.com> Mon, 13 May 2019 01:03 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1CD2120203 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 May 2019 18:03:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.464
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.464 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jRqS6F4d-9iN for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 May 2019 18:03:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-23.smtp.github.com (out-23.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.206]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8015812013B for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 May 2019 18:03:37 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 12 May 2019 18:03:36 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1557709416; bh=N0h0ez0+GGUu03jI/0qCS33k51uzPwrDUTnNkgmbj8w=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=ycjnH1KRnVZSMZeCd/F8bahY5HTdcXpvbPKnpnv1kOokkMeQRiQHxhJ5DeJWjK6Br TeR21eqpZyLrSx29GSOnQnM/ZUQpeiAJs7VZYJvzQ9+jmLBqBc01iSKokes2MVMuLd ipaEO2CIj34jNsylv/6PJqoLTM3Yyb0Y0uz2L/DQ=
From: ianswett <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK6POAINCZRCPJZPVMF24X2OREVBNHHBTZE2DQ@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2630/491645245@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2630@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2630@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Define "under-utilization" of cwnd (#2630)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5cd8c26882ac3_28503fe6f2ccd968715886"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/04MZtXvmnofLSSez1lPddOIQnFE>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 01:03:40 -0000
@janaiyengar Good point about the in_flight > 1/2 CWND check in Linux. In BBR, that only applies to the first doubling of IW, and after that it's fully bandwidth based, FWIW. We could add a similar constraint that this rule can be applied when the window was not fully used at the time of sending, but was at the time of acknowledgement as long as the window is < 2*IW? One clear goal of mine is I don't want the handshake alone increasing the congestion window(assuming IW10 and a moderately sized handshake). -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2630#issuecomment-491645245
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Define under-utilization (#2… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Define "under-utilizatio… Gorry Fairhurst
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Define "under-utilizatio… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Define "under-utilizatio… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Define "under-utilizatio… Gorry Fairhurst
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Define "under-utilizatio… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Define "under-utilizatio… Matt Olson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Define "under-utilizatio… Praveen Balasubramanian
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Define "under-utilizatio… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Define "under-utilizatio… ianswett