[quicwg/base-drafts] Do we still need Retry packets? (#1233)
Marten Seemann <notifications@github.com> Sun, 18 March 2018 23:04 UTC
Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6C9F12D869 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Mar 2018 16:04:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.484
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.484 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R4618ppOY9IF for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Mar 2018 16:04:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from o1.sgmail.github.com (o1.sgmail.github.com [192.254.114.176]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54B4F12D810 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Mar 2018 16:04:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=LG2ii+ngNJDa84nWMuabeNQfU1o=; b=qgNBrRP6gkhAWZVl pXbgo7C8aZQ7XUDl9T0kxJR4awsRNwHTHh4vNeLwJe4sjlhzuDnVuF9ZxzQoIeJb mJZG4pXuAcTcFA5EayWEWCL/ZMS3rySGLlIOBfRz3QHBYo0X9VLA5Jggv2MwiTeJ 5dggQSj1MvfYQXlXLmSNv0QVmxA=
Received: by filter0606p1iad2.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0606p1iad2-19150-5AAEF08B-4 2018-03-18 23:04:43.055707703 +0000 UTC
Received: from smtp.github.com (out-3.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.194]) by ismtpd0009p1iad2.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id dm_YdmftSQC3OW27NIFx2g for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Mar 2018 23:04:43.008 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2018 23:04:43 +0000
From: Marten Seemann <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abfc69221a93db385d66ac04e8669e8235bb8eba0892cf0000000116c6b28b92a169ce1241ad3b@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1233@github.com>
Subject: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we still need Retry packets? (#1233)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5aaef08b20da_aa203f88bbf98f341793e5"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: marten-seemann
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak290yoJ4hRspHfF2QSxrOi6jBCmYg1SjwsWVx xLCq7gxG2YyWG3ufY/1mGWJf3YAN5X7Jz6/zZQB9UBCkkD3Nllk2tLZAuEC0VNc9E6CII45GSOKGd4 RwF+THHkBlSaVhhRjkywtBSJC9ihBrxwKJdSWnt/1UsVBcPpFvciP1jpoj50JTqEkiJ9+LKnFpE2NY U=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/0EOvf2jSc2xbBNHITNv5sabkCB8>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2018 23:04:46 -0000
After the recent header changes, there's no need for a Retry packet type any more. The server could send its HRR in a normal Handshake packet. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1233
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we still need Retry packe… Marten Seemann
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we still need Retry p… Subodh Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we still need Retry p… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we still need Retry p… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we still need Retry p… ekr
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we still need Retry p… ekr
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we still need Retry p… Subodh Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we still need Retry p… Martin Thomson