Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] It seems the minimal packet number length should be 14 bits (#2955)

Luo Kai <> Wed, 07 August 2019 02:43 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E557120096 for <>; Tue, 6 Aug 2019 19:43:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.382
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.382 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b2O-_OZaGh6E for <>; Tue, 6 Aug 2019 19:43:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3A1012000E for <>; Tue, 6 Aug 2019 19:43:38 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2019 19:43:37 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1565145817; bh=QFpzHtuaOli2Cx+HoIU07zrQ9efvSo3fmW9ToyizHjs=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=dnqASJlPSSpkHmj0y7/9tw+E+BRcjU9+cuRT5iS4lYAUWmOC4je+PVk77upVj110p rw7bhiJGARarXziEmnchwksdR6Az4pBV2jzsZnvdq3eUmJOoNNSis2L0r2LtpxgSs1 onHZnjEv2HopDsCyLY+wrHvlVr8BpMq56u5fSnMI=
From: Luo Kai <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2955/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] It seems the minimal packet number length should be 14 bits (#2955)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5d4a3ad9cfbba_20143f84e8ecd96426846c"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: NKTelnet
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2019 02:43:41 -0000

> > This issue will cause the receiver ""ACK the wrong packet number"" and the related stream will hang for ever.
> That's not correct. If you decode the packet number incorrectly, decryption of the packet will fail, since the packet number is used as the nonce for the AEAD. Really, the worst thing this will happen in this case is that the packet is discarded as undecryptable and eventually detected as lost by the sender.

Thank you very much. I will close this issue.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: