IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why are we bothering to number CIDs? (#2159)

janaiyengar <notifications@github.com> Sat, 15 December 2018 01:40 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE0CA130EBA for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 17:40:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.842
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.842 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1.46, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WunW368M3aJa for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 17:40:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-5.smtp.github.com (out-5.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 087E2130EB1 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 17:40:45 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 17:40:44 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1544838044; bh=iQCU4Y1IBue3dyL0UtgvvCsprjfcpf+4ENskhXNTRSU=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=UNAcabj8S7J9je/uPd3WJJXi++Vy1fYGj56ftDZWt9l4OF9phtqxbvhcRs12Z5yvu Hh5ces/TgSQJCbb57kdClyKbIgAV58mIw0Tj5wedSrA2+HCpd0nsKqqP1sSvc7IJ/d 5rJqMYyD2lFdDycFHM/kCOg1T01JTklD9ErpTc4w=
From: janaiyengar <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab7299ca7ec69af1c27d009743930647ae634f6dba92cf00000001182c1d9c92a169ce174c07b8@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2159/447526150@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2159@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2159@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why are we bothering to number CIDs? (#2159)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c145b9c2698e_7843f902fed45b411324a4"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: janaiyengar
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/0msZnwIzyIsdtxMN1JkcNNIthxU>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2018 01:40:47 -0000

Right - this fixes the bug where an endpoint retires quickly and forgets and now considers a retransmission to be a brand new CID.  It's easier to ensure correctness with counters, and it's easy enough to implement. I suggest we leave this as is.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2159#issuecomment-447526150

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email