Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Duplicates are dropped (#1624)
Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com> Wed, 01 August 2018 06:29 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE8A5130E06 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Jul 2018 23:29:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.109
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.109 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pARrZ101JrBy for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Jul 2018 23:29:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-5.smtp.github.com (out-5.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CAA0F130DDA for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Jul 2018 23:29:44 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2018 23:29:44 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1533104984; bh=xHqYd66chseSn8zgoYbuGdSXps79goRQhLIHpz9FDsU=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=MJJVb5eT+TiBcy16WP/j2PTGHwW2Dl38n6G1dEdqbobU6S5ug/Fszw20pxrQIS2Hp 5x/V7dGjh87eR9xlYh4V9DNjMRJtW/sV2F9brHlmsNqKzjNpSCAjtqEk7pH+1bFHpW 0YIc6cc3kb+gbGRBO7cLcKRQO61gKVNLp2U1Nado=
From: Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abafb4fdbe14d3a9a6e1c542785ad89a9cfc81ddcb92cf000000011779155892a169ce14a685b4@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1624/c409464106@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1624@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1624@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Duplicates are dropped (#1624)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5b6153582eeff_11903ffc618be618414490"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/0rcCjAzhTqUjNn41uYWinoW-Jo0>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2018 06:29:47 -0000
Some of us assumed that this was how it had to work. Mainly because it is hard to think of a good reason to allow acceptance. Consider: what if the same packet number was used for different content? Other than it completely breaking most AEADs, what was it that was acknowledged? I can add a reference to Section 9.3 of the TLS doc. I didn't think that it was necessary, but it's easy to do. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1624#issuecomment-409464106
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Duplicates are dropped (… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Duplicates are dropped (… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Duplicates are dropped (… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Duplicates are dropped (… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Duplicates are dropped (… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Duplicates are dropped (… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Duplicates are dropped (… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Duplicates are dropped (… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Duplicates are dropped (… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Duplicates are dropped (… Marten Seemann
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Duplicates are dropped (#162… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Duplicates are dropped (… ekr
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Duplicates are dropped (… ekr
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Duplicates are dropped (… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Duplicates are dropped (… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Duplicates are dropped (… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Duplicates are dropped (… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Duplicates are dropped (… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Duplicates are dropped (… janaiyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Duplicates are dropped (… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Duplicates are dropped (… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Duplicates are dropped (… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Duplicates are dropped (… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Duplicates are dropped (… Martin Thomson