IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify PADDING vs PING frames (#838)

Igor Lubashev <notifications@github.com> Thu, 05 October 2017 19:23 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D59CF13431A for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Oct 2017 12:23:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.616
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.616 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mA6gEd_TlSmo for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Oct 2017 12:23:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from o3.sgmail.github.com (o3.sgmail.github.com [192.254.112.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F4F713263F for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Oct 2017 12:23:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=Vxwu9zZeO14kFZXjCdR1c5vAinI=; b=IpWD06J6dpuJHNQo g+q1a6VkY5dW7aW0Cpzn6w/MQglhgrrS/H9T/8VkTv90AHdOCuuuFmoKMZT6MfGL n+lrRlBuXFrpkbX/m/l+KUNxmZVUm7uMJzk6DOAZtvbNIET2T8OhBRie34dSIzLQ TRT/f28Xnju0ICeu9FPXUJEZIkQ=
Received: by filter0042p1iad2.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0042p1iad2-30964-59D686A4-27 2017-10-05 19:23:16.638948394 +0000 UTC
Received: from github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net [192.30.253.16]) by ismtpd0004p1iad2.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id cISgnIagRtOU4j0HPLdXng for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 05 Oct 2017 19:23:16.594 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2017 19:23:16 +0000
From: Igor Lubashev <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab1deb29f5ff23bb7a89874e5ae553c727cad8edee92cf0000000115ee48a492a169ce0fb03aff@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/838/334566550@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/838@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/838@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify PADDING vs PING frames (#838)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_59d686a4233b2_5b873fc4d967ef347536"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: igorlord
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak0jWSLIJNq4alINMJw3S6SvftRJHs+6ktAcl4 o2EKj8zj6Ya0wFJIQDmS+MSYkhI/GaVO2MD2KvcP86M+nwQWWH8eKjHT4DmVrbUbGKvehbpQw1F1AG SRLm+HQcMbz2H9Q1dONnfTBHNSOKn+ettw1ic6NJd7bkyITJUoPn6gnpUctjhZURIiEtRJkO5NLo60 Y=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/18JiSOeRMaYid4t-lneuCHf1CZo>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2017 19:23:19 -0000

@ianswett, why are you worried about not counting PADDING for congestion control?  Are you worried that someone may accidentally add 1KB of padding (because they want all of their packets to be same-sized, for example)?  If so, it is especially as important NOT to ACK PADDING (because you can have the always-pad implementation on both sides of the connection).

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/838#issuecomment-334566550

v2.31.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status