IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Transport parameter registry is too constraining for innovation (#3020)

Kazuho Oku <notifications@github.com> Thu, 12 September 2019 01:42 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E84F12001A for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 18:42:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.353
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.353 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qQjibm5wh4jC for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 18:42:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-24.smtp.github.com (out-24.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.207]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC4E7120013 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 18:42:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-2ef7ba1.ac4-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-2ef7ba1.ac4-iad.github.net [10.52.16.66]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECBEF6A0647 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 18:42:01 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 18:42:01 -0700
From: Kazuho Oku <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK2ZIZT3JFZIW24UBBF3Q3KOTEVBNHHB2WTA7U@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3020/530629679@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3020@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3020@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Transport parameter registry is too constraining for innovation (#3020)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5d79a269ddd74_31013fe8248cd95c183328"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: kazuho
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/1EpiCXyT1SH7YOOwzGnCUz2GeWg>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 01:42:04 -0000

> From our perspective, this isn't a significant change to code.

The same for us, too.

Am I understanding correctly that the concern here is that extensions of TLS structures tend to use uint16_t as their type identifiers, and that the reusable parser might be constrained to that design pattern?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3020#issuecomment-530629679

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email