Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] introduce a version alias mechanism (#2573)

Mike Bishop <> Fri, 19 April 2019 19:51 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33BB312001B for <>; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 12:51:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GBPRMsw60jh1 for <>; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 12:51:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BCB7312036E for <>; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 12:51:01 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 12:51:01 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1555703461; bh=ch0yPLfEqkgM1/IsIes33rJ8YbuoeQwMLPDYzczZyNU=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=XDUURdLUQsWnQFFWk2/gwLILdheJxKYHe8sTm7JvoebS6+FEO18tA0xBmsGniF/e8 e0GRRsiEg/+zeApto1i7c5GRuElDKkIX79rwAP/H09IH4sChRGjrdEKqxQtu253fQU I3ee8J3P8D8aICN8uHNnv7FxYRqtrPLxVQx/gKs0=
From: Mike Bishop <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2573/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] introduce a version alias mechanism (#2573)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5cba26a587a7_1d583fb17b2cd960156526"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: MikeBishop
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 19:51:05 -0000

> > If the pool of servers handling one version is different from another pool, for example in a blue/green deployment. Since client decides ODCID, you have nothing but the version to route on. You could, however, use a retry to get a new DCID so traffic will route correctly.
> We already have text that you shouldn't use the ODCID for routing anyway. This applies especially in a setup like this.

Per #2026, we don't have such text, actually.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: