Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] loss of only two packets can lead to an unrecoverable situation (#2267)

Kazuho Oku <notifications@github.com> Mon, 07 January 2019 07:24 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62A2D130DE5 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 6 Jan 2019 23:24:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.064
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.064 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.065, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i0PnIqLzW6zg for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 6 Jan 2019 23:24:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-7.smtp.github.com (out-7.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C672130DCD for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sun, 6 Jan 2019 23:24:08 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2019 23:24:07 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1546845847; bh=r+nhmZEEq7BhPfn8FyNt4bb5BpjSpxbTxk2cexjEwog=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=qGcKY6YO/Y21gUj2SsbYg4B41XIQREanMQYvTuIsUDywnS/L9Lpv4N6bwTets3VT4 6EEtRyfialeVhoQ8yvZ7SbXFnSHMklb/RWEar7Fo4H8f+A8wTIXjQzPvKjWga376qJ oEyWh7r9wgpcFnL2/J7wD65tPkHOzrDu4qCtRkrU=
From: Kazuho Oku <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab427a6f19c1793940f3903b54d8efc1c26342fe5392cf00000001184ac09792a169ce1784eaec@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2267/451844018@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2267@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2267@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] loss of only two packets can lead to an unrecoverable situation (#2267)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c32fe97b379f_5f043f86686d45c4206912"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: kazuho
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/1QWTcE0iIip1BfszF0vveGbmzc0>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2019 07:24:10 -0000

@huitema 
> I think this issue is an indirect justification for implicit ACK.

I am not sure if it is. To me, it seems that the fact that we have an unrecoverable situation for lower epochs and if we need to shutdown the connection in such a situation are different.

Can't the endpoints simply continue communicating using higher epochs, regardless of if there was something not ACKed when they drop the context of lower epochs?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2267#issuecomment-451844018