Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet number transform should be negotiated (#1296)
bobdug <notifications@github.com> Tue, 05 June 2018 00:56 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83526130E29 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Jun 2018 17:56:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.009
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.009 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nFsWQM-lKJoQ for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Jun 2018 17:56:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-7.smtp.github.com (out-7.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C11F130E3C for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Jun 2018 17:56:29 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2018 17:56:28 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1528160188; bh=PhlhbNlot1GB6oXRIX1icldqU9kVyzDtgPJe041ASmo=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=cBOtVCG9DofT+4mYpRJO+Vku7QielaZC+sczoyuCaGqm4UUqQ2f99jeWNMc3MlNbf Blhg1aoFWVTSlqkcsGllY459gs265nAOVTvcCn3U7J/sCheNPbHlBtgypiQzWXFV0W VAt2Sjs7PcE+2sPUNXWZmX1BhVPyk+C57Q3JFeEc=
From: bobdug <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab2f2204915d442a25fee47aa81a68c9ceac5deb3892cf00000001172da1bc92a169ce12c973b1@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1296/394546103@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1296@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1296@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet number transform should be negotiated (#1296)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5b15dfbc90d9d_30922b1dcf808f5031099"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: bobdug
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/1Qh9pQ6jb7-erSaIgjk1qR0nz0A>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2018 00:56:32 -0000
With the rapid increase in Ethernet and bus speeds, the need for hardware offload has become critical in encryption applications. Besides the reasons stated by @pravb, from this hardware vendor’s point of view, requiring packet number encryption makes the QUIC protocol less friendly to offload. It requires an added pass through the hardware crypto engine and depending on the hardware implementation, this can result in a loss of performance or additional complexity. It would hence be ideal to make this feature optional. That would have the added benefit of allowing the hardware ecosystem time to mature to support this feature, especially at higher speeds. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1296#issuecomment-394546103
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet number transform … Praveen Balasubramanian
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet number transform … janaiyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet number transform … borisPis
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet number transform shou… Praveen Balasubramanian
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet number transform … Praveen Balasubramanian
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet number transform … janaiyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet number transform … MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet number transform … Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet number transform … bobdug
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet number transform … Praveen Balasubramanian
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet number transform … Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet number transform … ianswett