IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] allow PRIORITY frames referring to placeholders exceeding `SETTING_NUM_PLACEHOLDERS` (#2761)

Kazuho Oku <notifications@github.com> Wed, 12 June 2019 21:46 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68BA4120194 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 14:46:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.391
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.391 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5M9JJlxpswa7 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 14:46:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-22.smtp.github.com (out-22.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.205]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC8C5120189 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 14:46:08 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 14:46:07 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1560375967; bh=13Rw+vH1blSPHvaQy0c/j5P5sGOxrwTRui2EXWAQ/4Y=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=qMMM+NXtqOIxfa12i3FIPLK1KXnBFKcMM/HA5y0QyQVI6MEsUloS+WzH+Kq3Bvq5U 3TQHNIIIi2RjoF6p6LOwMW5UjUQaDahef0dDmwow0j05ovVAgl16pEsJ7S9Uuemxsf 6/rFrJ/BYbQ0oCXxv7CzXu2CHYzAeXfVLB08550s=
From: Kazuho Oku <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJKZI6Z5GIU35CB62CG53B2SR7EVBNHHBVW7INY@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2761/c501466861@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2761@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2761@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] allow PRIORITY frames referring to placeholders exceeding `SETTING_NUM_PLACEHOLDERS` (#2761)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5d01729f9784d_17c53ff83eccd9601174dd"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: kazuho
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/1dyjHRe2gIi9GgMQkLnxog-SIp0>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 21:46:11 -0000

@ianswett 
> As I've stated elsewhere, I'm not a fan of this because I'd like placeholders to be optional and be able to enforce this, in an effort to keep H3 as close to H2 codewise.

Could you please elaborate a bit more? While I can see why you argue for "placeholders to be optional and be able to enforce this," I do not see why doing so makes H2 and H3 closer.

H2 allows client to create placeholders without regard to what server actually does, and this is about bringing back that behavior.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2761#issuecomment-501466861

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email