IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] are flow control frames really idempotent? (#1612)

Subodh Iyengar <notifications@github.com> Wed, 01 August 2018 02:30 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AA28130F93 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Jul 2018 19:30:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.109
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.109 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id op9MHlwAGOkV for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Jul 2018 19:30:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-7.smtp.github.com (out-7.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DEA69130F8E for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Jul 2018 19:30:18 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2018 19:30:17 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1533090617; bh=rOK6pzZUrPVwSobAL8kEesfZzMJnEcRGP6clctBe+48=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=2MldvfXQjCrKgh5aQnTMQoaTnPCEvEH7vVcLIJAs3kk4Rh604/mSN2/hdZMFZesij n+VFzr/aqxTy6NifrvoiukH0qbj+TKmH0Jw/G38RBeWG9S/PxQD0UbMRDkut8DVr8e kqXqtNf9skNSuDX79HkawEZ4G/nyV71ykUIZNpWM=
From: Subodh Iyengar <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab98e4f45066e460ea73de81378ededb22de2f81c992cf000000011778dd3992a169ce149fd7cc@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1612/409428946@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1612@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1612@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] are flow control frames really idempotent? (#1612)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5b611b39c0d14_184c13fd9096be6183468a9"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: siyengar
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/1ykkQTuu2H_c8uxoGancIFJxDi0>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2018 02:30:20 -0000

While I'm not a huge fan of this change, it looks like I'm in the minority here, so it's fine with me.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1612#issuecomment-409428946

v2.31.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status