Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why are error codes not a varint? (#1940)

MikkelFJ <notifications@github.com> Thu, 13 December 2018 09:39 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8FC4130F6F for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Dec 2018 01:39:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.842
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.842 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1.46, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gPZnywgJFGHj for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Dec 2018 01:39:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from o3.sgmail.github.com (o3.sgmail.github.com [192.254.112.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C267124BE5 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Dec 2018 01:39:52 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=Y/iHVr8Q8OasuguzC6ML7fNiTPk=; b=FFgyV4t07dmJFYkZ NBhvU4sBzRzbflhvm0fB1VJ1J9rQT9w+gUIlbe1bTVDQq2uKZx40DHt/8JShsNB4 Tqd9+z01IU3ffujKRUflTYltRioqBYttdIbyLSiqoovN8lZdWii2CN/iI9GyM2bY /AUSXkKs7HEwf/jfEwZRdqDdRzo=
Received: by filter0943p1las1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0943p1las1-6969-5C1228E7-6 2018-12-13 09:39:51.192575235 +0000 UTC m=+107164.749449177
Received: from github-lowworker-cef7735.cp1-iad.github.net (unknown [192.30.252.35]) by ismtpd0029p1iad2.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id 7efARiw5R4qblj3M8NCSdg for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Dec 2018 09:39:51.120 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from github.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by github-lowworker-cef7735.cp1-iad.github.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1754C1E0422 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Dec 2018 01:39:51 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2018 09:39:51 +0000
From: MikkelFJ <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abee9ea691d8bd29ac6c1731afd9da202a5f8cc7c192cf000000011829eae792a169ce16660d11@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1940/446903714@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1940@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1940@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why are error codes not a varint? (#1940)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c1228e715c5f_7c063fab5b0d45bc942b8"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: mikkelfj
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak0I67AqFlny432STx4j9twH29TMby2jr5Puwr D3uQY0gqoM0US5mTFLizC0iDjTTmSrCDN/i4yUwIpK2f+YUgmHEhbdXY4nfkn38vrqlnWaIk8MS+/j VeEtdIPg5PIPl/amI3boH6Kr1OEUiYOsaNe68qqQoxqqa8YMNkzzfPE6SA==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/262z8GceyLIhSWD00Sc2My1BrSs>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2018 09:40:05 -0000

I'm not arguing against big endian per se (well I would, in a separate discussion), but the endianness is a moot point if all encodings are opaque or varint - and it would be nice to sidestep that discussion if there are only a few hold-outs left.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1940#issuecomment-446903714