Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MAX_STREAM_DATA discrepancy (#1744)

MikkelFJ <notifications@github.com> Fri, 14 September 2018 17:58 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D8C2130F00 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Sep 2018 10:58:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.01
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LdVAdYsrCp_j for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Sep 2018 10:58:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-5.smtp.github.com (out-5.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54563130F23 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Sep 2018 10:58:01 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2018 10:58:00 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1536947880; bh=VDPKXzRb2mmZ038gREl75lw8wxQF/3p9CrCshNGlUU4=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=rGLhQ5pXLphJkbCXXeIJs5bc4dg3DqEQAUc1tZqdXPnRKgcQmwmOCJobosUzPdTGe uLqRcdT9tDHdbSXy4vESf1/Sv+rz189G1LBkwlHSmkx7ETp9wyAMpoYapTSFsKIy/V YN4rn9zZbALFv4B3Tg0O9huWie6D28Wg/DOWX/TQ=
From: MikkelFJ <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab4fd207f5e6fec2f3036cc603961dd9837148bdc592cf0000000117b3b8a892a169ce15753857@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1744/421437251@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1744@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1744@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MAX_STREAM_DATA discrepancy (#1744)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5b9bf6a8a5f16_51013fb2a78d45c016508d"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: mikkelfj
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/264z6TdnMqeN5ykiDQtZqIHIRXU>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2018 17:58:06 -0000

It doesn't matter if data is ack'ed or not and to the stream it doesn't matter if data is retransmitted. What matters is largest offset, exactly because it is not sensitive to race conditions. The stream limit has to do with the application more than flow control at the transport level.

Transmission and retransmission does count against global data limits because it is placed in a new packet in a new frame, and this is senstive to flow control at the transport level.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1744#issuecomment-421437251