Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ACKing ACK (#291)
ianswett <notifications@github.com> Thu, 16 February 2017 16:28 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA4A2129D7E for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 08:28:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.386
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.386 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-1.887, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xwpb3wolRUft for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 08:28:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2-ext5.iad.github.net [192.30.252.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3EACD129D59 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 08:28:00 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 08:27:59 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1487262479; bh=dZoYmpO9Hhbq1M9a+cOGj++/h0fGUeTxoFtZJTX6xH8=; h=From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=os8amo8pOYleiljjSN9dCR2RehJ9g4rlB1jCRY9wa2b3RiVCzzorpdycdUeybX4Xg rTsAsNA0heHVsIQXwdJDwUdKjdnLM4Y9hxO7FzETJB2/CVzqpGAmpABylQShXbhGMd 0C2hWXXyY6afC7nn5RekDPgg7UkAj24xg82LI26s=
From: ianswett <notifications@github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/291/280381139@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/291@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/291@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ACKing ACK (#291)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_58a5d30f88281_562c3feba08a313c4878cd"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/2F0ae86Mq8TigZhN6NYXYAkjZCA>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Reply-To: quic@ietf.org
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 16:28:02 -0000
Now that I've thought about it more, I think the best rule is to not ack acks, and if the peer wants an RTT measurement, it can use a PING frame. Acking acks just feels odd. So I suggest we remove the text about acking every 20 acks. In regards to limiting PING frames, there are lots of ways to waste time and bandwidth. In TCP or QUIC, you can send a bunch of packets with single byte payloads, which the peer would also ack. I'm not sure what you mean about fast path? A PING frame would be acked at whatever rate other ACK-able packets are. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/291#issuecomment-280381139
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ACKing ACK (#291) Martin Thomson
- [quicwg/base-drafts] ACKing ACK (#291) Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ACKing ACK (#291) ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ACKing ACK (#291) hardie
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ACKing ACK (#291) Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ACKing ACK (#291) ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ACKing ACK (#291) Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ACKing ACK (#291) ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ACKing ACK (#291) janaiyengar