Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Bring back the Exclusive Flag (#2781)

Mike Bishop <notifications@github.com> Tue, 11 June 2019 22:28 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A50DF12006A for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 15:28:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.009
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.009 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z2Uc7AN0AyO7 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 15:28:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-2.smtp.github.com (out-2.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.193]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D59C212001E for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 15:28:38 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 15:28:37 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1560292117; bh=OWZzYQEiNGweKgk4DCu0+oLKkybqtJCqO/wzu3cU4OU=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=VBtS9mvW5+Ik88+2H7sA9qDDGM/X/96dvcirfbNfMz+B7HoESXRtOZ/J2eiHYOlTa IuMg1KdgZIp9T6dM5psFGJ6DV21/Hy2+9pFXTqlZJAK5AmzHcDgZIOr4L9yLcQp9ic 3uLcszIjD9tRm2q3dCqaRckAwVyqa9pescs7klrw=
From: Mike Bishop <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK44WQ2CBVKYDJ3Q66N3BVOZLEVBNHHBWFUTBA@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2781/review/248467903@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2781@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2781@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Bring back the Exclusive Flag (#2781)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5d002b15a34eb_5ff13fadaaecd9601062e1"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: MikeBishop
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/2HgeO4pt0DZRiQpF8CpqHgu4nQE>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 22:28:41 -0000

MikeBishop commented on this pull request.

Minor things; overall, looks good!

> @@ -620,9 +625,8 @@ When a prioritized element is first created, it has a default initial weight of
 orphan placeholder; pushes are dependent on the client request on which the
 PUSH_PROMISE frame was sent.
 
-Requests may override the default initial values by including a PRIORITY frame
-(see {{frame-priority}}) at the beginning of the stream. These priorities
-can be updated by sending a PRIORITY frame on the control stream.
+Requests may override the default initial values by sending a PRIORITY frame

Including it at stream creation is overriding the default priority.  I think I'd just call this "update" and say that everything has default priority when it's first created.

```suggestion
Priorities can be updated by sending a PRIORITY frame
```
\+ reflow

> @@ -1192,7 +1191,6 @@ of the associated Element ID fields.
 | 00      | Request stream   | Stream ID                       |
 | 01      | Push stream      | Push ID                         |
 | 10      | Placeholder      | Placeholder ID                  |
-| 11      | Current stream   | Absent                          |

Since the value of `11` was the only difference between these, we could re-combine them to a single table and simply say that prioritizing Root is invalid.  (Which you already have on line 1213.)

> @@ -1984,10 +1977,9 @@ commutative, both sender and receiver must apply them in the same order to
 ensure that both sides have a consistent view of the stream dependency tree.
 HTTP/2 specifies priority assignments in PRIORITY frames and (optionally) in
 HEADERS frames. To achieve in-order delivery of priority changes in HTTP/3,
-PRIORITY frames are sent as the first frame on a request stream or on the
-control stream and exclusive prioritization has been removed. HTTP/3 permits the
+PRIORITY frames are sent or on the control stream.  HTTP/3 permits the

```suggestion
PRIORITY frames are sent on the control stream.  HTTP/3 permits the
```

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2781#pullrequestreview-248467903