Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Recommend discarding bad, unauthentication packets (#2141)
ekr <notifications@github.com> Thu, 13 December 2018 15:55 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17F141277C8 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Dec 2018 07:55:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.056
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.056 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1.46, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4-oKbjb8umb7 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Dec 2018 07:55:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-7.smtp.github.com (out-7.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7EFD5128C65 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Dec 2018 07:55:56 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2018 07:55:55 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1544716555; bh=aX+0JB8EICCyFIrE+dGwknS1yEjSEpdOb8lVslU90s4=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=KY0Yj2kCBOilHnA4/T9d8mejolf3BXeosb93GNFZLeUq42NQ+BVA86t5N/+Yv7Ec6 quvkljZPn7L+Gjb+Ff4Jv6qj68EPoARtjX8snLpQh1jFFpUgl0noX8okIKPiQ9AkME 6z71+k9ogP41UXU3emqnC6XtY3yEEga4zGA6kT/k=
From: ekr <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab6626c3c54d6c5d7fdbb2f9ec85ef042807c14b4092cf00000001182a430b92a169ce174735aa@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2141/review/184732800@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2141@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2141@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Recommend discarding bad, unauthentication packets (#2141)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c12810b28fc0_7bd73fe240ad45b4245044"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ekr
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/2OejZXoUkTRq5RfHREAewwNFmPA>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2018 15:55:59 -0000
ekr commented on this pull request. > @@ -1000,6 +1000,12 @@ to more quickly identify when a connection becomes unusable. Packets that are matched to an existing connection, but for which the endpoint cannot remove packet protection, are discarded. +Invalid packets without packet protection, such as Initial, Retry, or Version +Negotiation, SHOULD be discarded without altering connection state. An endpoint @mikkelfj well, that's exactly what we're discussing. And given that we don't have a threat model for this class of attack, I'm not sure that that's true at all. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2141#discussion_r241455987
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Recommend discarding bad, un… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Recommend discarding bad… Marten Seemann
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Recommend discarding bad… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Recommend discarding bad… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Recommend discarding bad… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Recommend discarding bad… ekr
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Recommend discarding bad… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Recommend discarding bad… ekr
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Recommend discarding bad… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Recommend discarding bad… ekr
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Recommend discarding bad… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Recommend discarding bad… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Recommend discarding bad… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Recommend discarding bad… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Recommend discarding bad… Marten Seemann
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Recommend discarding bad… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allow discarding bad, un… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allow discarding bad, un… Martin Thomson