Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Remove hole left in error codes from early response removal. (#3367)

Kazuho Oku <> Tue, 21 January 2020 01:37 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4249C1200D8 for <>; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 17:37:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.754
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.754 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F5b3BSOaoLR9 for <>; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 17:37:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A5E812004D for <>; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 17:37:27 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 17:37:26 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1579570646; bh=drsxCFYIW8M86rkvj4cyO8DOiTWbPepXD4Azs9vfQgk=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=xEYaMiOkghj63BqAZ7JNsJLO6xEjmyyZbQWlQ7cXLE5uRj4VTLWI8kYXjii4LvReO mWZfSErsfb+qEozRLZsiyx10UCM36O88qJc9zKECBdXAo9fIxlxpff+8ycyE8T0qgf G2jgheet2TttP8fE2YVNBLA7quFcjAiAi6NC1fQ0=
From: Kazuho Oku <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3367/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Remove hole left in error codes from early response removal. (#3367)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e2655d6e0f2_19ba3fc1016cd96c3532b0"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: kazuho
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 01:37:29 -0000

If we are to renumber things, I'd appreciate it if that could be done before we start running the protocol in production.

The reason is that once we ship QUIC and H3, it is likely that we'd be required to run more than one draft version concurrently. Once that happens, change of codepoints becomes a headache.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: