IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Long Header Packets and Routing Connection IDs (#2834)

Nick Banks <notifications@github.com> Sun, 23 June 2019 18:02 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ED65120219 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 23 Jun 2019 11:02:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.391
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.391 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sPpVDPB7CYx5 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 23 Jun 2019 11:02:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-23.smtp.github.com (out-23.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.206]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B19DD120154 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sun, 23 Jun 2019 11:02:43 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2019 11:02:42 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1561312962; bh=TZ8U6WHYQNfmfuwSTi0VpBn6e6Fvzfcas6t24+0V00Q=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=WUkhYvBf6DiSdqJ+3vPicI2qx3HlZeoXmKvRTZ+YDe8xUEGmpZTCgQAEHRjz4sbwI N0Z+uT/9fVKTrXfZPE5UidykRpkg7f4PI8fIvlpsYHALW1ZupJ17+44IMZzL1SnQSq hoBa7RF+WhFxMdJb/roFLOk8ucNWpTv5PoFt4Oik=
From: Nick Banks <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK5OAILJ4PQP2HMMWEV3DTYUFEVBNHHBWZGHNE@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2834/504773912@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2834@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2834@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Long Header Packets and Routing Connection IDs (#2834)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5d0fbec23ec85_4de53fa1d0ccd95c640276"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: nibanks
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/2ZnXLVbuITqVtB4b_2Q1JqAMEnc>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2019 18:02:46 -0000

> If the client retransmits initial, it might land on another server, but that should work fine.

The client can send several things in initial packets:

1. ACKs of the server initial packets.
2. TLS renegotiation packets. For instance, HRR response.

Bottom line, the client continues to use Initial packets beyond the first one it sends. But with the current CID design, those packets use a new CID.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2834#issuecomment-504773912

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email