Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] active_connection_id_limit interacts poorly with Retire Prior To (#3193)
Jana Iyengar <notifications@github.com> Tue, 19 November 2019 01:21 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36088120071
for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 17:21:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.382
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.382 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618,
HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5,
SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id QtR5JTiCDqJn for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Mon, 18 Nov 2019 17:21:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-23.smtp.github.com (out-23.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.206])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E83AF12004A
for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 17:21:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from github-lowworker-fb56993.ac4-iad.github.net
(github-lowworker-fb56993.ac4-iad.github.net [10.52.19.31])
by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 486D4660051
for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 17:21:51 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com;
s=pf2014; t=1574126511;
bh=SfFcPiBOxjLNRbGm4AwNHWSMc1/pOy+Zur5CLfrzmvM=;
h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID:
List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From;
b=1NX596Q8P3yAx8cxo1kJYwWJGS3hwQgbBLsNA0WSIYLTYzkBqo3/E3sET6CSvmVrb
T+t9zhkNayYG2qZwPLf/+83v8d67V2cEhtxVOE0ssFF8qQKUehwFv/RA3RTimLXArj
G+HABqNsJCQ22kUz1h/U2BsfGX+LSRYesChdqtQ8=
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 17:21:51 -0800
From: Jana Iyengar <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts
<reply+AFTOJK6UMPCRHIEVVCZQV5N34B3C7EVBNHHB5Y6ONQ@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3193/555287450@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3193@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3193@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] active_connection_id_limit interacts poorly
with Retire Prior To (#3193)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="--==_mimepart_5dd343af39648_5c463fccfe2cd96c304560";
charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: janaiyengar
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/2iQQGFFDmXwJS-HRoiGADvP5ZZs>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG
<quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>,
<mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>,
<mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 01:21:53 -0000
Having discussed this offline with @erickinnear and @kazuho, I now understand the new model that you are proposing. I'm fine with it. I'll leave my comments on the PR. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3193#issuecomment-555287450
- [quicwg/base-drafts] active_connection_id_limit i… Marten Seemann
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] active_connection_id_lim… Eric Kinnear
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] active_connection_id_lim… Marten Seemann
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] active_connection_id_lim… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] active_connection_id_lim… Marten Seemann
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] active_connection_id_lim… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] active_connection_id_lim… Nick Banks
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] active_connection_id_lim… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] active_connection_id_lim… Eric Kinnear
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] active_connection_id_lim… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] active_connection_id_lim… Eric Kinnear
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] active_connection_id_lim… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] active_connection_id_lim… Eric Kinnear
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] active_connection_id_lim… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] active_connection_id_lim… Marten Seemann
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] active_connection_id_lim… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] active_connection_id_lim… Marten Seemann
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] active_connection_id_lim… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] active_connection_id_lim… Eric Kinnear
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] active_connection_id_lim… Eric Kinnear
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] active_connection_id_lim… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] active_connection_id_lim… Martin Thomson