Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Early CONNECTION_CLOSE fixes (#3440)

ianswett <> Wed, 11 March 2020 05:36 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id C34073A1224 for <>; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 22:36:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.099
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tZIf1TGXXjlP for <>; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 22:36:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 631753A1222 for <>; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 22:36:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87863280033 for <>; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 22:36:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1583905011; bh=QWYGV+/o6cqL+e3699gHt7ri2ZUsy/moahuO9mTsSCI=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=aohz3IMh1s5dIdTYTj+gLRxwnSSs8ug4+8ZVSMI34asrdbSs2+p7SLoLPGDIZnid/ OTUkmKjMaAk3Wfxg6h4MBDKcabg97PwkcbDhhImUSnA8wBiva0DVymVi0keYPmMsrK TLqL2VYm6kWpnZr44luWYlicxwG37Sf5kfBRiPuc=
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 22:36:51 -0700
From: ianswett <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3440/review/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Early CONNECTION_CLOSE fixes (#3440)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e6878f3775cf_57273fc6684cd95c261843"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 05:36:54 -0000

ianswett commented on this pull request.

> @@ -415,12 +416,20 @@ A QUIC client starts TLS by requesting TLS handshake bytes from TLS.  The client
 acquires handshake bytes before sending its first packet.  A QUIC server starts
 the process by providing TLS with the client's handshake bytes.
-At any time, the TLS stack at an endpoint will have a current sending encryption
-level and receiving encryption level. Each encryption level is associated with a
-different flow of bytes, which is reliably transmitted to the peer in CRYPTO
-frames. When TLS provides handshake bytes to be sent, they are appended to the
-current flow and any packet that includes the CRYPTO frame is protected using
-keys from the corresponding encryption level.
+At any time, the TLS stack at an endpoint will have a current sending
+encryption level and receiving encryption level. Encryption levels determine
+the packet type and keys that are used for protecting data.
+Each encryption level is associated with a different flow of bytes, which is

Flow is a non-obvious word choice, maybe sequence of bytes?

Each encryption level is associated with a different sequence of bytes, which is

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: