Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Encrypting Retry token (#3274)

Kazuho Oku <notifications@github.com> Thu, 28 November 2019 03:28 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AFFF120956 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 19:28:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.382
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.382 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9Qo-I3CCrFda for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 19:28:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-18.smtp.github.com (out-18.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE220120116 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 19:28:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from github-lowworker-275fa97.va3-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-275fa97.va3-iad.github.net [10.48.17.64]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 119876E03B4 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 19:28:28 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1574911708; bh=KFkySxIftzGoLmA7OA/onpz4T5ftJLUTfslBD6QUBiA=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=FmC38wkVk7/bRa9tPS11b2/AtiAcrG1l2FOxRP/uBkFlYcl2X1ytHBGj8c3hK87mW ZuEsNQ/Pi8w+eFamutTKnhaeqNnZv1uhunbpvI/1Q1VOZAvUCZloKS2oQGn386dOaV nEes7PgKlV19ZSOPyYQOtRYmfp5lIFOalGdHNhsw=
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2019 19:28:28 -0800
From: Kazuho Oku <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJKZMFDR35TZ6B6CTNYV35RYVXEVBNHHB7CUNWA@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3274/559327038@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3274@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3274@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Encrypting Retry token (#3274)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5ddf3edc1c5a_4d323f8198ecd96c326595"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: kazuho
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/2kTYol8y_ztbB7IC0EzfKarQscc>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2019 03:28:30 -0000

@martinthomson 
> Since I did this, I've realized that even this was an overly pessimistic outcome. By precomputing the XOR stream for CTR protection, it should be possible to make an even faster version of the protected form here.

I might be missing something, but I wonder if you can precompute the XOR streams for all the nonces (2<sup>64</sup> bits).

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3274#issuecomment-559327038