IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] define compound packets (#1262)

MikkelFJ <notifications@github.com> Mon, 09 April 2018 20:02 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A39B712D7E8 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Apr 2018 13:02:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.384
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.384 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=0.726, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YUs1Aw_cncLP for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Apr 2018 13:02:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from o11.sgmail.github.com (o11.sgmail.github.com [167.89.101.202]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43CF21272E1 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Apr 2018 13:02:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=uWfTHkNnVs/v4Ymhct+qtmphvG4=; b=gUVQOYCM4FCQg/3Z +7ouqQl1rOMTAYvYMOvgpb8oLEZoQntSZzg90yxleqYVl65TdWxGleAbEwR90HUb AR6pReYFsjzJEG6ZHuH5brVeGjbiG+c74z/RIaFSGNwD6YQdxdB8u1zNeGzitqgg yL3YqX2N6Fuu9WMfa/xg2YXO/LI=
Received: by filter0819p1mdw1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0819p1mdw1-5034-5ACBC6CE-6 2018-04-09 20:02:22.079004193 +0000 UTC
Received: from smtp.github.com (out-3.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.194]) by ismtpd0004p1iad1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id cbMZ5RtHSpKTWWgdTZ23pw for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 09 Apr 2018 20:02:22.075 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2018 20:02:22 +0000
From: MikkelFJ <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abd871f2f4d524c92f0175ef1f4f58a09f01c8d91f92cf0000000116e388cd92a169ce128c773a@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1262/c379876192@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1262@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1262@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] define compound packets (#1262)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5acbc6cdf20db_61e62b00333dcecc7705b"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: mikkelfj
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak1QBDaUEnEqBJWxoAFEx4lI+gotliJ+ix512G g0wJmntf3J4xfQARJeeyYpnIzP+E839BtzpdmpzPmSHzbPii8m6Mz1rSNjNa+KW7XmAjEJ50zFp1GE BXC4mFf8BBcfp5+QXvp6ESGPZ+6XkTOc/vIVKC0EG55vjzx02zkerJSHnsGwOhekgubAL5DaqWp3z4 I=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/30J8GUZQcYMF00xxr8Gu_moDnyM>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2018 20:02:33 -0000

Note that varint packet numbers has on effect on my proposed variation of #1079 PNE because it is immediately obvious where the PN begins if you encrypt and attach to the end. This is not an argument against, but a note to consider exposing length info elsewhere +/- privacy concerns.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1262#issuecomment-379876192

v2.30.2 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status