Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Client's initial source CID is unauthenticated (#1479)
MikkelFJ <notifications@github.com> Tue, 26 June 2018 12:45 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A10B4131024 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jun 2018 05:45:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.009
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.009 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xsgsVp3EVNQu for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jun 2018 05:45:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-1.smtp.github.com (out-1.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.192]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26E27131021 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Jun 2018 05:45:27 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2018 05:45:26 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1530017126; bh=kZSnqpxY4D64vqEQnzxqTLXdg95mn+4DUdHmIDmJ+kM=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=F4KdHFnvx7zPKvYxn6jNfRoUgXzKn/QCa6Fb2KToaiQxleqTurefYsJcOdX4sU9NY sLXqvoGzPp0mbw7bkdeWeSGLp5wgCbJw6b8ZbFbIIaI2uriizZHLxSAYxE3af08EVA EMLvQjJ55ThlE33/M/k0r7jTywsaRuJV9otyoMhw=
From: MikkelFJ <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abd5c7af746bf6edf379fe46fba841f8fd7bac8c5a92cf000000011749f76692a169ce1403e20c@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1479/400294172@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1479@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1479@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Client's initial source CID is unauthenticated (#1479)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5b3235666571d_53293fb9a4206f78206732"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: mikkelfj
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/323bNbTDAY_Rlgxv50yiFRj2CRQ>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2018 12:45:30 -0000
It somewhat relates to: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1451 I suggest the intial CID become empty an a separate nonce is sent instead. This nonce should be verified by retry. But a normal handshake ought to also reflect it back to the client. I don't have the full overview of how the initial CID is validated today. There is path validation and TP validation, but in principle someone could race a handshake if the initial CID is not verified. That is what the long loop discussion is all about, except here it is race to win a retry. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1479#issuecomment-400294172
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Client's initial source … Christopher Wood
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Client's initial source … Christopher Wood
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Client's initial source … Christopher Wood
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Client's initial source … Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Client's initial source … Christopher Wood
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Client's initial source … Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Client's initial source … Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Client's initial source … Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Client's initial source … Christopher Wood
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Client's initial source … Marten Seemann
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Client's initial source … Nick Banks
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Client's initial source … Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Client's initial source … Martin Thomson
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Client's initial source CID … Christopher Wood
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Client's initial source … Christopher Wood
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Client's initial source … MikkelFJ