Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ALTSVC Frame (#371)

Lucas Pardue <notifications@github.com> Mon, 13 March 2017 14:55 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42ABD1296AA for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 07:55:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.383
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.383 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4y6_EZRHt1SX for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 07:55:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from o5.sgmail.github.com (o5.sgmail.github.com [192.254.113.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3120A12955D for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 07:55:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=wjUtle763kSKIg/hEVLmEK3oaK0=; b=W3PtqKZcf1ccSK5t GOszpr+HUgTCfHio5mJjgfv1Nw4KdasAbs+TI5Cx3AZlgxFmRB449O5u+x7W0q1U X/b2COU412frF81fplNqB3/HAZ3U9q+Yg/YKSMuN4/j+1LpUHjiyePVnEGUS67pt wkKrAsN+75qLMHaWxJuBzfCRR48=
Received: by filter0916p1mdw1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0916p1mdw1-26616-58C6B2F2-64 2017-03-13 14:55:46.620963832 +0000 UTC
Received: from github-smtp2b-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2b-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net [192.30.253.17]) by ismtpd0005p1iad1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id iDZBRsNFTMaRZ2vdNeTt1A for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 14:55:46.565 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 07:55:46 -0700
From: Lucas Pardue <notifications@github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/371/286131770@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/371@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/371@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ALTSVC Frame (#371)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_58c6b2f276f78_283f3fe8281c5c3c686af"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: LPardue
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak3S1jF5460uq1DPr9GdRB7JHm3pV2v/tCPCXf B+DtOUCTUa2xmMQB5nmdC2Nx2vhFagW6MXdt3vF1r2i2nYf6wChL3WREuJrV2BaU/IraMeGMdQ3IsS jQMImt54858JseyUtOnpfnZkuOjoDo+EqA4qIMYaMbMsAHUhhO1ENH3EeOtk15ZTkYJaHvvZwdSJJJ s=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/32iJMA21kqXad_fWpmJ1kTv7d9g>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Reply-To: quic@ietf.org
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 14:55:49 -0000

I think that option 3 (kickback to httpbis) sets a good precedent for future extensions that want to use HTTP/QUIC. This potentially makes it clearer that drafts in httpbis-land shouldn't expect a free ride from the QUIC WG.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/371#issuecomment-286131770