Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Reduce restrictions on valid RTT samples (#2568)

ianswett <> Wed, 03 April 2019 19:49 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D469120640 for <>; Wed, 3 Apr 2019 12:49:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2vst0m7iZ0NH for <>; Wed, 3 Apr 2019 12:49:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C182612063E for <>; Wed, 3 Apr 2019 12:49:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed;; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=vPRtJPL4OVFgnSPgEsJI7/sFzio=; b=D2VJ1j14FWNbfayy PfHJWRTj6zOKq23LNj+ZJNmNROr+qJNlYRgfpYSzCLqPQPJm78N+wnifQoe7T00v 5kD/eyY8FuBpr74kES5Pp1I7dzNOUyPAlzO6989uA8OWhUJ+J2JiZQ24yfX0e9QU xRayouCLGaDSSZJEwxDdawJ9sqw=
Received: by with SMTP id filter0997p1las1-28214-5CA50E61-13 2019-04-03 19:49:53.36478538 +0000 UTC m=+1146387.942804407
Received: from (unknown []) by (SG) with ESMTP id Hhydv2MzS0q9c18yGhLcHg for <>; Wed, 03 Apr 2019 19:49:53.262 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CA43420A3C for <>; Wed, 3 Apr 2019 12:49:53 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2019 19:49:53 +0000
From: ianswett <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2568/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Reduce restrictions on valid RTT samples (#2568)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5ca50e613a798_48a23fa698cd45b41949da"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak2xccByB5JKsxJymWot6mrpBtFzEhI/etuR+e LXo1sjwjVzRaK49sVVW3YTfb+ScuTVUH2CGyBbqdmnAAD+lto+pCAjRbeeobG3FfdY30WyTlhST6i9 TCznc/Bdku62ByV4xwmRPZP/ZtTOuhf/OWJbcgdrOaCXD7IKKP56XyIIXH8CUhzZlTi1RURQNvIrMV Q=
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2019 19:49:57 -0000

+1 to @janaiyengar 's last comment.  I look forward to a PR.

In regards to the last paragraph, we already have some text in transport about this, and I'm not sure how specific I want to be, given it's only really important as a mechanism for the sender to drop state if they're waiting for acks of acks.

 "Because ACK frames are not sent in response to ACK-only packets, a
   receiver that is only sending ACK frames will only receive
   acknowledgements for its packets if the sender includes them in
   packets with non-ACK frames.  "

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: