IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] TIME_WAIT (#328)

Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com> Fri, 28 April 2017 01:18 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37E75129C0C for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 18:18:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.397
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.397 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.8, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nORY5ZiXQHO9 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 18:18:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from o8.sgmail.github.com (o8.sgmail.github.com [167.89.101.199]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E508129C1C for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 18:15:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=lYExeKFvZ3+HwtqUGWC8blQAbzM=; b=lp02Cm3JT20jhpnc f+f6VOGMynjWG4Fl/MM976r0/pyIaCmPADXUVOcusk2j9gziMR6uZB/MwGzIshPb HtO26ItrMmuYj2/ghwmF8LyXgYBgWey8kGROSv0ch5AD5ztqLcX6PZC+s54gmUY+ PD6bVanV+iBqv4iKxvdxlvIYCpk=
Received: by filter0872p1mdw1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0872p1mdw1-12713-59029793-A 2017-04-28 01:14:59.095993955 +0000 UTC
Received: from github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net [192.30.253.16]) by ismtpd0002p1iad1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id OWL-hglaRiK3QDinBeeveg for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 01:14:59.055 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 18:14:58 -0700
From: Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab32a27596b5680a2c266ee5d48c984ef403833a2c92cf00000001151a599292a169ce0c744e0c@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/328/297881202@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/328@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/328@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] TIME_WAIT (#328)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_59029792edc46_3ae93fcdda08dc3864678"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak2UVWnxM0obeB2SXrvHDqyW4KBLyNb9v1iJ88 vJ923jURQ61qA80aoZ8bSPYB6s/WaDiw0aiA2glIDUAi+KAwkS86RDLrMrOuFa6Z+mK6x1WYFXtV1T iZTOCBBqHcxzkpnm2HIXdYfCGgwIMzDpSks4q8/WYvzUaU25lbCmx/dXd5+mJODucRZJ+LHJcxSuRi Y=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/3LnnT5TitilKNy0zIIKEO6nqKAs>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 01:18:23 -0000

I think that @MikeBishop is right.

Rather than just fixing this one small thing, I think that we need a more comprehensive rework of the shutdown logic.  @janaiyengar sent an email to the list outlining one extreme in the design space.  I want to write up a proposal that is close to that.  That will necessarily include a roughly 2xRTO TIME_WAIT2-like state on both peers.  Then we can discuss whether that sort of design is desirable.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/328#issuecomment-297881202

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status