Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Send after receiving an ACK (#3047)

ianswett <> Wed, 18 September 2019 02:38 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 824E5120096 for <>; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 19:38:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.454
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h6TmI5Vb7kzg for <>; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 19:38:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D74FD120026 for <>; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 19:38:40 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 19:38:39 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1568774319; bh=8omF/ALUqvnbQoABw6dR5iN/q5dQoUlSlnfBEdXhKkE=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=xnL7oV3feZKj/HTWrnrN1X+bhOdxRBEIyZqB/e94SYKnCJMlzB/9WZ7sgkMWXF7Vj VTEFQlbZX8EPZVhW2+2Wl3dZd0yIQ+BclE8AtwdMcmcAknqx5Fxqa90DHKte5goVCm byFGUCwtxiVQqgVGOlDADJm4myP11GB7IewNZPpE=
From: ianswett <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3047/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Send after receiving an ACK (#3047)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5d8198afdfb11_7bab3f81e2ecd9681832d8"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 02:38:43 -0000

There is a section for the congestion controller below.  I think this is a response it can choose to have, rather than incorporating it into the loss recovery/detection pseudocode?

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: