[quicwg/base-drafts] Recovery incorrectly declares packets lost at higher encryption levels (#1413)
ianswett <notifications@github.com> Tue, 05 June 2018 08:52 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90E94130F1F for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jun 2018 01:52:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.009
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.009 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rSR0QOffk3Lo for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jun 2018 01:52:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-3.smtp.github.com (out-3.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9AB69130F1D for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Jun 2018 01:52:03 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2018 01:52:02 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1528188722; bh=2v5rBIwZVH3V8r4HaXNNS7gxlrh0Nkvxz95/jm2JBW0=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:Subject:List-ID:List-Archive:List-Post: List-Unsubscribe:From; b=gY4Y9WMa7zT+QPB2eQBfNM3o1O61xUpFuKtPln1xu0mKlG5LU5OuRS13oSxTnyOCK d+tXiCicu7lLC6HporMsSyZmrU0l1dJBTU1OcU96yROigVVyh3dAOKAGGiMQWznRuF xtWIhOyM9AHQ/52hO05O7YszJ9UXI7cXD1gfLQLo=
From: ianswett <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4aba1e3a9399e0164e70ecac0f506e0fc84b77a854592cf00000001172e113292a169ce13a1a1e6@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1413@github.com>
Subject: [quicwg/base-drafts] Recovery incorrectly declares packets lost at higher encryption levels (#1413)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5b164f3284a91_2e82b2350772f6014917a"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/3lOLVYrkL7nbUmRvXKXc_Z7KlA4>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2018 08:52:06 -0000
Currently the recovery draft indicates you should use fast retransmit to declare packets lost, even if there's no evidence the peer can decrypt the packet. A simple example is if the first client initial is sent with 0RTT and then the Initial is lost; Then the client Initial is retransmitted and acked, 0RTT packets will be declared lost via early and/or fast retransmit. If QUIC sticks with a single packet number space, then encryption level will have to be added to each outstanding packet we'll have to not declare packets at an encryption level lost until at least one packet at that level has been acked. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1413
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Recovery incorrectly dec… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Recovery incorrectly dec… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Recovery incorrectly dec… Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Recovery incorrectly dec… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Recovery incorrectly dec… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Recovery incorrectly dec… ianswett
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Recovery incorrectly declare… ianswett