Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Long Header Packets and Routing Connection IDs (#2834)

[Nick Banks <[e-mail]>]

@mikkelfj currently, when processing a LH Initial packet, from just the packet header, the LB cannot determine how to route the packet, if it has two different sets of logic: one for client chosen CIDs and one for server chosen CIDs.

Instead of waiting until short header packets to change the CID, you could wait until Handshake packets, but I don't see how this makes things better. I don't understand your statement:

> It would also allow a client to decide where state is managed during a handshake, to a degree, which opens to an attack.

The whole point here is that you want to route all long header packets to the same place. Why would you route the initial packets one place, and then handshake packets somewhere else? If you didn't like where they went in the first place, don't route them there.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2834#issuecomment-504766651