Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ACK generation recommendation (#3304)

Kazuho Oku <> Wed, 18 December 2019 01:04 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA7CF120045 for <>; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 17:04:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.382
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.382 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5zAhithi19yQ for <>; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 17:04:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37068120018 for <>; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 17:04:37 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 17:04:36 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1576631076; bh=Dxk71jH5ZbYF07bUlL/6StrtwoAswE1pjKAKxwZ6GE8=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=ibS4PwxqVXWOdy6LK2kjIi5ViNccQPEsK9X1GEHrbgRaOxOWV3puSxdDhUvpjjRD/ edBI4T47UUxfuqX6zO9btKgZBI+pj8Ts3pGwxTxS2BxjFITa+aY4vzVXfqp5C9tffN uxkTV9MZ12qVtqviyrhn/Q83vqOhJXPAVP7sk8lE=
From: Kazuho Oku <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3304/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ACK generation recommendation (#3304)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5df97b24781f9_36813f83904cd96812947d"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: kazuho
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 01:04:39 -0000

> There was still a regression with 1/8th RTT and Cubic. We we using pacing at the time, FYI. Not pacing or pacing differently may lead to slightly different results.

Oh. Then, am I correct in assuming that Chrome is (or will be) sending ACK for at least every two ack-eliciting packets?

IIUC, the recovery draft recommends use of Cubic. We'd definitely want to see good performance with what we recommend, when Chrome is acting as a client.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: