Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] allow dropping of Initial packets with invalid reserved bits (#2053)

MikkelFJ <notifications@github.com> Mon, 26 November 2018 13:47 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCF13130DE1 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Nov 2018 05:47:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.46
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.46 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1.46, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ErV_DkNEvP9s for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Nov 2018 05:47:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-5.smtp.github.com (out-5.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57595130DDF for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Nov 2018 05:47:25 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 05:47:24 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1543240044; bh=+qgwoSH7ePFLajaXufLu1NNCQdjelitvQ2FXjIZONa8=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=j2gOC0WklWlTC+oLkWszYsjzOI1hyEPdygjeMtNmk4L37JLvkpiiaYFUu2o4MLVJl rp2X6rOqYYcHLyC8PqsErIjrYArWjZ1ctX7s55IOOj7JK3WH+gspN0bT8++DdsB49z XduIgo+Vq2uQpjByA90o7udyMfzY81vo6wjf5Vko=
From: MikkelFJ <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab43b1996c6851db60ca223e711048009b078af12492cf000000011813bb6c92a169ce16e78b2d@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2053/c441644201@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2053@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2053@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] allow dropping of Initial packets with invalid reserved bits (#2053)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5bfbf96c8673a_7ecc3fe0622d45c4451843"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: mikkelfj
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/43lspJYRfQoJCK9layEbyWxChoc>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 13:47:27 -0000

> I don't see what this is buying us. In order to generate a packet which deprotects successfully but has bogus reserved bits, the attacker must know the CID, which effectively means it must be on-path

That is right, but it does happen offer a fast rejection of random packets (unless we require full AEAD verification to avoid timing attacks, which I think we do?). Fast rejection can be useful in DDoS attacks.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2053#issuecomment-441644201