Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3A6F12007C
 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 23:25:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.463
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.463 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
 DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,
 MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
 SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01]
 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
 header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
 by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id SXWmrK5l70ol for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>;
 Wed, 12 Jun 2019 23:25:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-19.smtp.github.com (out-19.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.202])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40237120033
 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 23:25:19 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 23:25:17 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com;
 s=pf2014; t=1560407118;
 bh=J+1jLPsgfZ5tefZLHSztQZl1w6JBVE6PGM/DJ/+wySQ=;
 h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID:
 List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From;
 b=WJBogGNGaj8LBopuiCpv9md1KfJsEW6+qyzQmOJf3az0aJDROFP96MOKvP9h+bdgi
 uF9KdxkhYep8JaT6RAhnYFVpkDPxsMDC+7IgMHeh2K6Tjw5HqdMA4ehxnKoraJJ9Mi
 PsojN0EPqTJEg3X8gUSojOEV9LQY1R61nz88uooc=
From: Kazuho Oku <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts
 <reply+AFTOJKZFNVPNZKYFWTJCEEN3B4PM3EVBNHHBWJUB5A@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2787/501566377@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2787@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2787@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] HTTP/3 has less concurrency than HTTP/2
 (#2787)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="--==_mimepart_5d01ec4dee7fb_629d3f8a658cd96076222c";
 charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: kazuho
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/4LtZsuvmcEmc7kltpgikw5UHu84>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG
 <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>,
 <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>,
 <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 06:25:21 -0000


----==_mimepart_5d01ec4dee7fb_629d3f8a658cd96076222c
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Admittedly, I did not argue how appropriate it is to use initial value as a way of describing the expected parallelism. If we are to address that too, the suggestion would be more like the latter (i.e. "provide clients window to issue 100 requests in parallel").

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2787#issuecomment-501566377
----==_mimepart_5d01ec4dee7fb_629d3f8a658cd96076222c
Content-Type: text/html;
 charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<p>Admittedly, I did not argue how appropriate it is to use initial value as a way of describing the expected parallelism. If we are to address that too, the suggestion would be more like the latter (i.e. "provide clients window to issue 100 requests in parallel").</p>

<p style="font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">&mdash;<br />You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.<br />Reply to this email directly, <a href="https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2787?email_source=notifications&amp;email_token=AFTOJK6AZ7G3B2GCDFVQCRLP2HR43A5CNFSM4HXVM3Y2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGODXSUXKI#issuecomment-501566377">view it on GitHub</a>, or <a href="https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFTOJKZTVTFOCQ7CUOERSMDP2HR43ANCNFSM4HXVM3YQ">mute the thread</a>.<img src="https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AFTOJKZNKE5JLAWC223JWFTP2HR43A5CNFSM4HXVM3Y2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGODXSUXKI.gif" height="1" width="1" alt="" /></p>
<script type="application/ld+json">[
{
"@context": "http://schema.org",
"@type": "EmailMessage",
"potentialAction": {
"@type": "ViewAction",
"target": "https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2787?email_source=notifications\u0026email_token=AFTOJK6AZ7G3B2GCDFVQCRLP2HR43A5CNFSM4HXVM3Y2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGODXSUXKI#issuecomment-501566377",
"url": "https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2787?email_source=notifications\u0026email_token=AFTOJK6AZ7G3B2GCDFVQCRLP2HR43A5CNFSM4HXVM3Y2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGODXSUXKI#issuecomment-501566377",
"name": "View Issue"
},
"description": "View this Issue on GitHub",
"publisher": {
"@type": "Organization",
"name": "GitHub",
"url": "https://github.com"
}
}
]</script>
----==_mimepart_5d01ec4dee7fb_629d3f8a658cd96076222c--

