Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Bound 0-to-1-RTT Transition (#2466)

Martin Thomson <> Thu, 14 February 2019 22:39 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2E00131215 for <>; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 14:39:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.001
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zM-vJOt70jFZ for <>; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 14:39:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DA1812D4EA for <>; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 14:39:04 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 14:39:03 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1550183943; bh=vkk0Wr3a344YXqWRWE6oUz2cPMo80N1F9plAuGVDmZU=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=BHWGEpzbN6z9IASK69caV28QmJEDDEGt0WmKI1nl2gPOvY58P5Vfip7k15WjBjnsh hieaYn4J9oFHBAFDjvXzBDHUclhJYcbuJ655dxHljaWK8fs5brdRFiCCid3DWKIgql vBoIjura5910z9LzSvbg1VsXYRG6YZDmerA2QgTY=
From: Martin Thomson <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2466/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Bound 0-to-1-RTT Transition (#2466)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c65ee0788c3f_6fa23fde7acd45b81388a4"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 22:39:06 -0000

> It's entirely possible that we spec #2461 and people implement #2466 as a good-enough way of achieving the requirement. :-)

That's OK.  Because #2461 establishes the right expectations for new transport parameters, whereas this doesn't.

If the complaint about #2461 is the complexity of enforcement, given that it is a MAY-strength requirement, I fail to see what the fuss is all about.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: