Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Order of Coalesced Packets (#1287)
Nick Banks <notifications@github.com> Wed, 06 June 2018 13:11 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B47D130E8D for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Jun 2018 06:11:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.01
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y1_Ld0mQ5u6f for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Jun 2018 06:11:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-15.smtp.github.com (out-15.smtp.github.com [192.30.254.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 237AD130EFB for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Jun 2018 06:11:50 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2018 06:11:49 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1528290709; bh=R1/6/yln3XuawClliGT9XWjOmNpMbpqLtvtgpptpW0A=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=DI2PZX6PedLEyDPHm/aAGvDfxzIblem99s1TlMWOWKDq/rbqzIoucJo64DJA1ZFGO 9ZjAe5eQjpi7gN1Vkg/bWCeRuKMYeQ9/zmkacMpt8d2Y4j2NR006ov8wbvEw7+/BwV Gje9PGtlDBWZ6l/ZpOxve84dDnowksp9MeJ/f2kY=
From: Nick Banks <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abf9f5ae03daa5872c8522da49ef92cdf506a7267392cf00000001172f9f9592a169ce12ae7fcb@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1287/395063052@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1287@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1287@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Order of Coalesced Packets (#1287)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5b17dd9578e49_693b3fbd92c90f8822227b"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: nibanks
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/4MYQw0T5O78sauMMpMDuS9iVv_o>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2018 13:11:55 -0000
I think it's a bit of a semantic issue at this point. In my mind, as the receiver of the packet, if something is wrong with the header, I can only assume there were no more packets and I am therefore not violating the MUST by throwing it away. Either way, the MUST is not enforceable as far as I can tell. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1287#issuecomment-395063052
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Order of Coalesced Packe… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Order of Coalesced Packe… Nick Banks
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Order of Coalesced Packe… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Order of Coalesced Packe… Nick Banks
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Order of Coalesced Packe… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Order of Coalesced Packe… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Order of Coalesced Packe… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Order of Coalesced Packe… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Order of Coalesced Packe… Martin Thomson
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Order of Compound Packets (#… Nick Banks
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Order of Compound Packet… Dmitri Tikhonov
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Order of Compound Packet… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Order of Compound Packet… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Order of Compound Packet… Nick Banks
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Order of Compound Packet… Nick Banks
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Order of Compound Packet… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Order of Compound Packet… Nick Banks