Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Go Back to Single Packet Number Space (#1579)
Nick Banks <notifications@github.com> Wed, 18 July 2018 15:59 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E40F2130F3C for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Jul 2018 08:59:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.009
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.009 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HrHSvsU0S2fs for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Jul 2018 08:59:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-1.smtp.github.com (out-1.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.192]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF452130DFE for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Jul 2018 08:59:29 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 08:59:28 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1531929568; bh=qjWT5HxZyTkFqjt/2JoAFfK/sXvyFGcSlRoTg4iqC+w=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=UF+wUuHsGQv87Eert34JMgqOseP8c6O1qCDJNhcYRtCL1MJUxUgiOdUHiRSrM5v+0 sDbIbMdxbLedy2jp3rl7RPDVEymLmkCYOkG8LfJy1h+JS7iNAdTCOpL3GztU7DoMmW am97JEfVRsfk4qjCGtk5b/8CczuWOa8mmdEwVUNw=
From: Nick Banks <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abeb6d7817bede3fbb2422376adac0f9ecb5a0f35f92cf00000001176725e092a169ce14638397@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1579/405983400@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1579@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1579@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Go Back to Single Packet Number Space (#1579)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5b4f63e0cc8e6_42643fa5f6cbef7c120282"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: nibanks
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/4PIwkdeZJevFS_PKDKZeUJd3uo4>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 15:59:32 -0000
For #1413 I'm still a little unsure how exactly the loss recovery works for 0-RTT during the handshake with separate packet numbers. It seems to get even more complicated (just goes back to the original state?) if just the sender uses a single packet number space. Bottom line, no matter what, I think we need additional text for #1413, even if we don't change packet number spaces (though I still really think we should). -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1579#issuecomment-405983400
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Go Back to Single Packet Num… Nick Banks
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Go Back to Single Packet… Nick Banks
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Go Back to Single Packet… ekr
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Go Back to Single Packet… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Go Back to Single Packet… Nick Banks
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Go Back to Single Packet… ekr
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Go Back to Single Packet… Nick Banks
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Go Back to Single Packet… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Go Back to Single Packet… Nick Banks
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Go Back to Single Packet… Nick Banks
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Go Back to Single Packet… Nick Banks
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Go Back to Single Packet… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Go Back to Single Packet… Nick Banks
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Go Back to Single Packet… Nick Banks
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Go Back to Single Packet… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Go Back to Single Packet… Mark Nottingham