Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Transport shouldn't be cancelling streams (#485)

Mike Bishop <notifications@github.com> Mon, 08 May 2017 02:47 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0B27126CD6 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 May 2017 19:47:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.183
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.183 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.8, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nwmGed1k-apI for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 May 2017 19:47:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from o5.sgmail.github.com (o5.sgmail.github.com [192.254.113.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6933D1243F3 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sun, 7 May 2017 19:47:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=B94KBWJzD48pQ+EKxg7uOwLvLTU=; b=BnEyGjBoPjJtqOJK 2RJWSF0oCOPzOOV9BIjgwP0EJiMY6K8TRL1k3t1GlbycTnFJ9E+oPOy7ESeJwjbP uCFxeaE0mL1orvRlkKn96YeIvJUQNh4FcVkB2ZwlAn3eQ1k9HuVx1s95JTLQnMJX /YZ/cQntQrrZRvvQ5CrTeJ6F2/A=
Received: by filter0433p1mdw1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0433p1mdw1-30384-590FDC34-35 2017-05-08 02:47:16.905560769 +0000 UTC
Received: from github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net [192.30.253.16]) by ismtpd0002p1iad1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id 4uTMqUqtQeyJlm8ED2CIzg for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 08 May 2017 02:47:16.723 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Sun, 07 May 2017 19:47:16 -0700
From: Mike Bishop <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abe28eaa355709b2e148b2d8683bbb6e585d1ebe3492cf0000000115279e3492a169ce0d692fd6@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/485/299760270@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/485@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/485@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Transport shouldn't be cancelling streams (#485)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_590fdc34916cd_38d63fa52c353c3c18668c"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: MikeBishop
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak2+xR6ebgreaYLtOaQylJ+VRk5fNFpP18UgQq lRw9h6+8sZUC8cadB5J7XQzAPF4j2pvHR0PD7librcISfRaPbUgVv+dJh9501b0SBWNfaCsIBT8Z4A NG5nf761tBkGuMk6peMjOcxlVNr9xIqKm5saYRpc7JKA6KSNn5mhJh5naVhsLV9D+inOkrUyX84W4C 4=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/4TgkIiXmt74zve_mTQB21MlL-2E>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2017 02:47:21 -0000

...without reliable delivery of said application error, no?  The problem is that stream data is inherently lossy in the presence of errors.  If we want to change *that*, fine, but it seems like an even bigger change.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/485#issuecomment-299760270