Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Unify TLP and RTO into Probe Timeout (#2114)

Praveen Balasubramanian <notifications@github.com> Fri, 14 December 2018 07:08 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EBA91310BD for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Dec 2018 23:08:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.46
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.46 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1.46, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9EsFq38lIMcY for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Dec 2018 23:08:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-5.smtp.github.com (out-5.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5ACC91310BC for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Dec 2018 23:08:21 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2018 23:08:20 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1544771300; bh=kBa1JRekFBLSztU+RHDr/uGMGSrxe/DdlsyaHvQc26U=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=uUv2c16OJ7CYYj+UadjUE6OjQV5BS+KeR1qh7lsgxxzCE28ihLCui4fzEz8Qqx5eO W157KK+f8Aq6rDQr+AEW0qqIllvjvP1efCqDymmHOU+yUn9/eZwU64g5jFcyoMHnJF CZCiBbWqV+2z9Issx8TO7KnLTcuY5oyyHU3ZDOFU=
From: Praveen Balasubramanian <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab91b07e6937ae9efbb852a9bd8b8380a1d66241e492cf00000001182b18e492a169ce173c5dcf@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2114/review/184988159@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2114@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2114@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Unify TLP and RTO into Probe Timeout (#2114)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c1356e4324b3_75303f810a4d45c0123764c"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: pravb
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/4VEUkQOSOqgFAiulaE1DPAIFMD0>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 07:08:23 -0000

pravb commented on this pull request.



> -
-QUIC includes MaxAckDelay in all probe timeouts, because it assumes the ack
-delay may come into play, regardless of the number of ack-eliciting
-packets in flight. TCP's TLP assumes if at least 2 ack-eliciting packets are
-in flight, acks will not be delayed.
-
-A PTO value of at least 1.5*SRTT ensures that the ACK is overdue.  The 1.5 is
-based on {{?TLP}}, but implementations MAY experiment with other constants.
-
-To reduce latency, it is RECOMMENDED that the sender set and allow the TLP timer
-to fire twice before setting an RTO timer. In other words, when the TLP timer
-expires the first time, a TLP packet is sent, and it is RECOMMENDED that the TLP
-timer be scheduled for a second time. When the TLP timer expires the second
-time, a second TLP packet is sent, and an RTO timer SHOULD be scheduled {{rto}}.
+~~~
+PTO = max(smoothed_rtt + 4*rttvar + max_ack_delay, kGranularity)

Sorry just noticed another difference. If peer advertises max_ack_delay as 0 (which seems to be legal), then first PTO becomes Srtt + 4 * RttVar, whereas in TCP the first PTO is 2* Srtt. If variance is low this may be too aggressive? Should we also do PTO = max (PTO, 2 *Srtt) ?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2114#pullrequestreview-184988159