Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Application close should be disallowed in Initial or Handshake (#3158)

ianswett <> Mon, 28 October 2019 14:22 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C6D812025D for <>; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 07:22:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.454
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IDzMSjtH9yML for <>; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 07:22:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC21B120115 for <>; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 07:22:06 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 07:22:05 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1572272525; bh=tQnS6v+lYoiiTx7Gs6IUEfCay+8agyz4myPfNl4dFEQ=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=ok+lOegGR8jxxNaGvo4tKfIzT1ihL93BH90bkjv04+HVwEBqF78AXLi499XszYWfM 5Bk/pcxONG33TFClpVe+YejQXsUpi1ZjNwGwLyehEjvMZZPagj/8f8eT2YqU1gyB8f JM3lbz1TX5LQogmMUhar44j9VDd1szLN7ho08hVA=
From: ianswett <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3158/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Application close should be disallowed in Initial or Handshake (#3158)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5db6f98da9ab8_7f2d3fb1088cd9642961a6"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 14:22:09 -0000

I believe I prefer 2, but if the application tries to close the connection with an application close before any data can be sent in 1-RTT, advise the transport close the connection at Initial or Handshake instead?  I believe that both honors the intent of the application and maintains some separation.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: