Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allow the Transport to Stop/Reset a Stream? (#3291)

Geoff Kizer <> Thu, 12 December 2019 21:27 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88BA8120142 for <>; Thu, 12 Dec 2019 13:27:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.382
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.382 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QNk5hLkI8PEC for <>; Thu, 12 Dec 2019 13:27:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33D8E120121 for <>; Thu, 12 Dec 2019 13:27:22 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2019 13:27:21 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1576186041; bh=SjJv39hFmyI8Ov5LEuahevWIRCFEuCN1Zo1eTQWazzo=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=g8WbRrsqBv1DskvgfbtY6Pr/SolUS79cvH7C6V+py90s3TqeqUogH4kCK29PvOYRO GP8Fn9lD7lEZ+Y+QDgSW3q6rxU9yI2yO0DXlYLqVP1eYLkNz5Y/Ka6A4wADGqLWeeU llnSefwQgShWUvVS0e0LZ4wDtaHJun75vLyNuo3o=
From: Geoff Kizer <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3291/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allow the Transport to Stop/Reset a Stream? (#3291)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5df2b0b963f4a_36e53fcb514cd9646666d"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: geoffkizer
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2019 21:27:23 -0000

> It seems even stranger to me to change the protocol in a way that's only needed when you write incorrect code.

Well, incorrect code happens. Bugs happen. I assume pretty much every app protocol is going to define some error code like INTERNAL_ERROR that basically means "something bad happened". 

The only change I'm suggesting is that we define a universal, non-app-specific error code for INTERNAL_ERROR, because this allows that code to be used in certain circumstances where it's hard or impossible to figure out how to represent INTERNAL_ERROR in an app-specific way.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: