Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Permit 0-RTT after Retry and VN (#1514)
Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com> Fri, 06 July 2018 00:23 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EF8D130DDE for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Jul 2018 17:23:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.009
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.009 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NzdZWBvP46B3 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Jul 2018 17:23:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-1.smtp.github.com (out-1.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.192]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6CDC1294D7 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Jul 2018 17:23:12 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2018 17:23:12 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1530836592; bh=HfegQ44TReV2vMMPt1FseVwnCRHlYxifkAWmP4smMTw=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=CkDcFSXOu8g19/6/Utx+7wpAbku9cNaqZ+GJaVcklm4pywTNKIw7N0iRlQZXGgFJX holfPL9Q10p9FkBsSsYDfbugtoeQe5WXudB/SaOc5yAqS1zSNGTHSCCt/apLAE3d9z ML7oq6ngeTTT0U2CJ30APgHPunIWWlUGK/4Ij7x0=
From: Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab06c34dd183bdf5b94777eec590c27017d99c107492cf000000011756787092a169ce1421be50@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1514/review/134856583@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1514@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1514@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Permit 0-RTT after Retry and VN (#1514)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5b3eb6702edb7_16622ae89aed4f608866"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/510ySfhwds6Zy-ntoc-PsppFKRw>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2018 00:23:15 -0000
martinthomson commented on this pull request. > @@ -770,6 +775,29 @@ are in a different packet number space to other packets (see {{packet-numbers}}). +### 0-RTT Packet Numbers {#retry-0rtt-pn} + +Packet numbers for 0-RTT protected packets use the same space as 1-RTT protected +packets. + +After a client receives a Retry or Version Negotiation packet, it MAY attempt to +send data in 0-RTT packets after it sends a new Initial packet. However, a +client MUST NOT reset the packet number it uses for 0-RTT packets. The keys I realize now the source of the confusion. You are concerned about the case where maybe all this 0-RTT is received (and can be processed). I'm more concerned about catastrophic compromise of packet protection. I think that the nonce reuse thing is more urgent. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1514#discussion_r200522553
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Permit 0-RTT after Retry… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Permit 0-RTT after Retry… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Permit 0-RTT after Retry… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Permit 0-RTT after Retry… janaiyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Permit 0-RTT after Retry… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Permit 0-RTT after Retry… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Permit 0-RTT after Retry… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Permit 0-RTT after Retry… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Permit 0-RTT after Retry… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Permit 0-RTT after Retry… Kazuho Oku
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Permit 0-RTT after Retry and… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Permit 0-RTT after Retry… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Permit 0-RTT after Retry… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Permit 0-RTT after Retry… Nick Banks
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Permit 0-RTT after Retry… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Permit 0-RTT after Retry… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Permit 0-RTT after Retry… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Permit 0-RTT after Retry… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Permit 0-RTT after Retry… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Permit 0-RTT after Retry… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Permit 0-RTT after Retry… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Permit 0-RTT after Retry… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Permit 0-RTT after Retry… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Permit 0-RTT after Retry… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Permit 0-RTT after Retry… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Permit 0-RTT after Retry… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Permit 0-RTT after Retry… Martin Thomson